|
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
| View Poll Results: Are we better, worse, or as good as our record? | |||
| We are a better team than our record suggests, we've just lost to some great teams |
   
|
52 | 62.65% |
| We are worse than our record suggests |
  
|
0 | 0% |
| We are what we are, a 6-6 team |
  
|
31 | 37.35% |
| Voters: 83. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
12-05-2005, 09:19 PM
|
#1 |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Age: 55
Posts: 5,006
|
Re: Redskins' Strength of Schedule: We Are A Decent Team
We are what we are, an average team. Good teams don't beat themselves and don't let themselves be put in position to lose close games due to referee errors, coaching decisions and fate.
__________________
Paintrain's Redskins Fandom 1981-2014 I'm not dead but this team is dead to me...but now that McCloughan is here they may have new life! Jay Gruden = Zorny McSpurrier Kirk Cousins = Next Grossman |
|
|
|
12-05-2005, 09:21 PM
|
#2 | |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: all up in your business
Posts: 2,693
|
Re: Redskins' Strength of Schedule: We Are A Decent Team
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
12-05-2005, 10:07 PM
|
#3 |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Yorktown, Va
Age: 57
Posts: 1,587
|
Re: Redskins' Strength of Schedule: We Are A Decent Team
We have won almost as many close games as we have lost, but here are my thoughts.
We are better than our record simply because Alstott did not get in. We won. We are better on offense than we were last year. We have had one hell of a tough schedule and are still alive to make the playoffs. If we go 9-7, I would be happy. We need another receiver and a couple of d-linemen to be dominant.
__________________
Not everything that counts can be counted, and not everything that can be counted counts. A. Einstien |
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
