Stafford in WFT Plans? He’s Available

[Chief X_Phackter]

I'ma get the F out then if go big means giving away more than #19 and #74. You can have a Matthew Stafford in the building, but if you don't have enough pieces around him, it won't matter.

Just sayin - Jimmy G was 5 minutes away from winning the SB last year, because he had a SB caliber cast around him. I'm not suggesting they go get him, but in my opinion, they shouldn't go big at the expense of the rest of the roster.

[CRedskinsRule]

Originally Posted by Chief X_Phackter

I'ma get the F out then if go big means giving away more than #19 and #74. You can have a Matthew Stafford in the building, but if you don't have enough pieces around him, it won't matter.



Just sayin - Jimmy G was 5 minutes away from winning the SB last year, because he had a SB caliber cast around him. I'm not suggesting they go get him, but in my opinion, they shouldn't go big at the expense of the rest of the roster.

Go big not go stupid. We have cap space and 8 draft picks. There is a lot of maneuvering that can be done within that framework to get a qb and still build the team.

Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk

[Ruhskins]

Originally Posted by CRedskinsRule

Go big not go stupid. We have cap space and 8 draft picks. There is a lot of maneuvering that can be done within that framework to get a qb and still build the team.

Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk

Agreed. Another thing people forget is that if you have a Watson/Stafford/Dak at QB, you don't need to have a defense that carries your team.

[KI Skins Fan]

Originally Posted by Ruhskins

Agreed. Another thing people forget is that if you have a Watson/Stafford/Dak at QB, you don't need to have a defense that carries your team.

The defenses dominated the 4th quarter of the GB vs.TB championship game.

[Ruhskins]

Originally Posted by KI Skins Fan

The defenses dominated the 4th quarter of the GB vs.TB championship game.

True, but I don't think our defense takes a step back if get any of those QBs. Hell, even if we have to trade Allen or Payne (I think it will likely be Allen), we get Matty I. back in that D-line.

[mooby]

Originally Posted by Ruhskins

Agreed. Another thing people forget is that if you have a Watson/Stafford/Dak at QB, you don't need to have a defense that carries your team.

Not saying you are advocating this approach, but this is a terrible idea.

Even Mahomes needed a competent defense to win a title last year.

Neglecting any area of the team in favor of the "stud qb wins titles" approach would be a bad idea.

[Ruhskins]

Originally Posted by mooby

Not saying you are advocating this approach, but this is a terrible idea.

Even Mahomes needed a competent defense to win a title last year.

Neglecting any area of the team in favor of the "stud qb wins titles" approach would be a bad idea.

But if we keep the same defense from last year, is that neglecting it? We still have free agency where we can address any deficiencies on both offense and defense.

I just don't get the idea that going after Watson or Stafford is somehow going to hamper other areas of the team.

[Chief X_Phackter]

Originally Posted by Ruhskins

But if we keep the same defense from last year, is that neglecting it? We still have free agency where we can address any deficiencies on both offense and defense.

I just don't get the idea that going after Watson or Stafford is somehow going to hamper other areas of the team.

It will, because you're adding 30-40 million of salary, and potentially giving away multiple high draft picks and invaluable young players.

[skinsfaninok]

Originally Posted by Chief X_Phackter

I'ma get the F out then if go big means giving away more than #19 and #74. You can have a Matthew Stafford in the building, but if you don't have enough pieces around him, it won't matter.

Just sayin - Jimmy G was 5 minutes away from winning the SB last year, because he had a SB caliber cast around him. I'm not suggesting they go get him, but in my opinion, they shouldn't go big at the expense of the rest of the roster.

Jimmy just can't stay healthy

[PorkSkins]

Originally Posted by chief x_phackter

i'ma get the f out then if go big means giving away more than #19 and #74. You can have a matthew stafford in the building, but if you don't have enough pieces around him, it won't matter.

Just sayin - jimmy g was 5 minutes away from winning the sb last year, because he had a sb caliber cast around him. I'm not suggesting they go get him, but in my opinion, they shouldn't go big at the expense of the rest of the roster.

+100