Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Redskins' Strength of Schedule: We Are A Decent Team

Locker Room Main Forum


View Poll Results: Are we better, worse, or as good as our record?
We are a better team than our record suggests, we've just lost to some great teams 52 62.65%
We are worse than our record suggests 0 0%
We are what we are, a 6-6 team 31 37.35%
Voters: 83. You may not vote on this poll

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 12-06-2005, 05:21 PM   #23
JoeRedskin
Contains football related knowledge
 
JoeRedskin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Second Star On The Right
Age: 63
Posts: 10,401
Re: Redskins' Strength of Schedule: We Are A Decent Team

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ramseyfan
The bottom line is, it’s easy and sexy to say that the record is the ONLY way to determine the quality of a team. It’s also incredibly simplistic to take that approach. As I said earlier, for purposes of determining who gets into the playoffs, the W-L column is all that matters. But, if you don’t take into account the strength of schedule in assessing how “good” a team is, I think you are being pretty simplistic.
What can I say, simple things for simple minds. Actually, in this case, I believe the simpler the logic is the more profound approach. Yes, the stats and strength of schedule give interesting comparisons to other teams.

BUT - Because the bottom line in this game is determined by actually winning games, by relying on anything other than the record to determine your greatness or mediocrity in comparison to other teams, you begin a process of, at best, making excuses, and, at worst, self-deception:

We are few dumb mistakes from being good.
Boy those refs screwed us.
If the ball had just bounced our way.

In each case, you make or allow yourself an out from self-improvement (even the "dumb mistakes" one b/c the usual response is "I/we just need to concentrate more", If more concentration was all it REALLY took to win, then I think their would be a lot more concentration going on - I mean really, did the Pats win the SB three times b/c they concetrated more?? No - they did ALL the things good/winning teams do. A feat we have yet to duplicate).

I am not just saying that making the playoffs equals a good team, what makes a good team is winning and doing what it takes to win - regardless of the bad bounces, the teams you play, or the refs calls. Once a team starts to believe that anything other than a failure to strive for perfection is responsible for losing, that team is on the road to losing. On that account, I think the Skins are walking a fine line.

Regardless of these various factors - good teams win more than they lose. We have not demonstrated an ability to do that. For the Skins, regardless of the circumstances, we win as often as we lose.

Good teams win more often than they lose regardless of the circumstances. Bad teams lose more often than they win regardless of the circumstances.

simple, schmimple - my logic, as always, is deeply DEEPLY profound. Your are probably just to simplistic to understand my depth.

Last edited by Sheriff Gonna Getcha; 12-06-2005 at 06:52 PM.
JoeRedskin is offline   Reply With Quote
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:22 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.97149 seconds with 12 queries