WFT's Off-Season Thread

[Monkeydad]

Originally Posted by CRedskinsRule

Its a yougov petition poll no way is it indicative of the team's intentions.

Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk

There's no proof either way if the team is behind the surveys or not.

[CRedskinsRule]

Originally Posted by Monkeydad

There's no proof either way if the team is behind the surveys or not.

They may be behind it but regardless it isn't anymore than a winnowing tool for the large pool of names that are being floated around. It has very little bearing on the main names in consideration unless one of those oddball ones suddenly rise. In NCAA terms the final four are likely WFT, Warriors, Wolves( or redwolves) and then whichever cinderella name pops from surveys like that one.

Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk

[Monkeydad]

Originally Posted by CRedskinsRule

They may be behind it but regardless it isn't anymore than a winnowing tool for the large pool of names that are being floated around. It has very little bearing on the main names in consideration unless one of those oddball ones suddenly rise. In NCAA terms the final four are likely WFT, Warriors, Wolves( or redwolves) and then whichever cinderella name pops from surveys like that one.

Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk

If there's thousands or millions of votes, I'm sure they'll reference it and factor it into the decision.

[CRedskinsRule]

Originally Posted by Monkeydad

If there's thousands or millions of votes, I'm sure they'll reference it and factor it into the decision.

If the club is behind it, they will look at it as one part of the entire strategy. Personally - i am submitting copyright claims for all of those.

Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk

[BaltimoreSkins]

Originally Posted by CRedskinsRule

If the club is behind it, they will look at it as one part of the entire strategy. Personally - i am submitting copyright claims for all of those.

Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk

If they are that is incredibly shoddy statistical analysis. No variable control what so ever. For all we know 100,000 11 year old boys are the ones voting. That being said that would be on par for the last 20 years.

[CRedskinsRule]

Originally Posted by BaltimoreSkins

If they are that is incredibly shoddy statistical analysis. No variable control what so ever. For all we know 100,000 11 year old boys are the ones voting. That being said that would be on par for the last 20 years.

It depends on the reliance they put on the data. I doubt that poll is the defining factor but you can use it to gauge some relative intensities. Even if it is 100,000 11 year old boys (which by the way for an NFL team that would be your ideal target - the bond formed rhen will last those boys lifetime ask my son the eli manning/nyg fan ) the energy behind the voting gives you some information.

Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk

[irish]

Originally Posted by CRedskinsRule

It depends on the reliance they put on the data. I doubt that poll is the defining factor but you can use it to gauge some relative intensities. Even if it is 100,000 11 year old boys (which by the way for an NFL team that would be your ideal target - the bond formed rhen will last those boys lifetime ask my son the eli manning/nyg fan ) the energy behind the voting gives you some information.

Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk

These polls are designed to make the fans feel involved and their opinion valued. I doubt WFT cares what the fans prefer and will choose whatever name the organizations prefers.