Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


WFT's Off-Season Thread

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-09-2021, 01:14 PM   #1
AnonEmouse
Playmaker
 
AnonEmouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: UK
Age: 60
Posts: 2,927
Re: WFT's Off-Season Thread

I have to ask the question why Rodgers would come here, given other choices? He's obviously going to be looking for a high profile team that gives him the chance at another SB, so that doesn't rule us out but it doesn't give us any edge over other teams the at would be in the running. I agree he would be a good target, but I don't think we're a target for him.
AnonEmouse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2021, 01:22 PM   #2
MissouriSkin
Special Teams
 
MissouriSkin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: Springfield MO
Posts: 322
Re: WFT's Off-Season Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by AnonEmouse View Post
I have to ask the question why Rodgers would come here, given other choices? He's obviously going to be looking for a high profile team that gives him the chance at another SB, so that doesn't rule us out but it doesn't give us any edge over other teams the at would be in the running. I agree he would be a good target, but I don't think we're a target for him.
We’re a better target than the Broncos and Raiders.
__________________
Lack of preparation on your part does not constitute an emergency on my part.
MissouriSkin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2021, 07:09 PM   #3
AnonEmouse
Playmaker
 
AnonEmouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: UK
Age: 60
Posts: 2,927
Re: WFT's Off-Season Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by MissouriSkin View Post
We’re a better target than the Broncos and Raiders.
Denver maybe not, but LV wouldn't be that far from LA to suit his Mrs. Are they just a top QB away? Maybe not but it's a good market for him to move to and gets him away from the tundra of nothing else. 😁
AnonEmouse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2021, 01:51 AM   #4
Scalper
Registered User
 
Scalper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2020
Posts: 419
Re: WFT's Off-Season Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by AnonEmouse View Post
I have to ask the question why Rodgers would come here, given other choices? He's obviously going to be looking for a high profile team that gives him the chance at another SB, so that doesn't rule us out but it doesn't give us any edge over other teams the at would be in the running. I agree he would be a good target, but I don't think we're a target for him.
He is going to want somewhere glamorous for wife. But what take chance on THE DAN when other teams have long history of competence. Too great a risk for end of career. Won't matter, GB isn't trading him.
Scalper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2021, 09:59 AM   #5
Monkeydad
Living Legend
 
Monkeydad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: PA
Age: 47
Posts: 17,460
Re: WFT's Off-Season Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by AnonEmouse View Post
I have to ask the question why Rodgers would come here, given other choices? He's obviously going to be looking for a high profile team that gives him the chance at another SB, so that doesn't rule us out but it doesn't give us any edge over other teams the at would be in the running. I agree he would be a good target, but I don't think we're a target for him.
Maybe the best defense in the NFL, good O-line and a ton of WRs instead of just one. Weapons at other positions, highly-respected coach, large media market...no Wisconsin weather.
__________________
Not sent from a Droid, iPhone, Blackberry or toaster
Monkeydad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2021, 11:11 AM   #6
MTK
Hail Raiser
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,094
Re: WFT's Off-Season Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by Monkeydad View Post
Maybe the best defense in the NFL, good O-line and a ton of WRs instead of just one. Weapons at other positions, highly-respected coach, large media market...no Wisconsin weather.
and the chance to stay in the NFC, with GB on the schedule this year.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2021, 11:16 AM   #7
CRedskinsRule
Living Legend
 
CRedskinsRule's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Age: 59
Posts: 21,745
Re: WFT's Off-Season Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by MTK View Post
and the chance to stay in the NFC, with GB on the schedule this year.
This would be a reason for Rodgers but also heavy incentive for GB not to trade him to us. If I am GB I trade him to Denver, high altitude, plays KC 2 times plus has to get past KC in the playoffs for a chance to get to the SB.

Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk
CRedskinsRule is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2021, 11:25 AM   #8
MTK
Hail Raiser
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,094
Re: WFT's Off-Season Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by CRedskinsRule View Post
This would be a reason for Rodgers but also heavy incentive for GB not to trade him to us. If I am GB I trade him to Denver, high altitude, plays KC 2 times plus has to get past KC in the playoffs for a chance to get to the SB.

Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk
GB should trade him to the highest bidder. Especially if this breakup is as ugly as it seems from the outside why placate Rodgers and trade him to somewhere he wants to go like Denver.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2021, 11:39 AM   #9
CRedskinsRule
Living Legend
 
CRedskinsRule's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Age: 59
Posts: 21,745
Re: WFT's Off-Season Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by MTK View Post
GB should trade him to the highest bidder. Especially if this breakup is as ugly as it seems from the outside why placate Rodgers and trade him to somewhere he wants to go like Denver.
If the bids are dramatically different than yes highest bidder. But if they are about the same, and one means facing Rodgers in the regular season and potentially in the playoffs, and one means playing him only in the superbowl, I would choose the latter.

I also think Denver would substantially out bid us.

I don't think they would be trading to Denver to placate Rodgers as much as it is better for their own playoff/SB chances.

Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk
CRedskinsRule is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:06 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.90418 seconds with 11 queries