![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Washington DC
Age: 39
Posts: 16,867
|
Re: WFT vs. the bye week thread
![]() Oh dear. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Establishment, establishment, you always know what's best. I've been a part of this message board for 17 years. Damn I'm old. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
From a Land Down Under
![]() Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: toms river, nj
Age: 55
Posts: 24,586
|
WFT vs. the bye week thread
![]() I feel like Ron just gets a pass. Its the OC’s fault. Its the DC’s fault. It is the backup quarterbacks fault. Ron seems extremely stonefaced during games. Doesn’t like to cut people. Doesn’t like to make changes. He was supposed to bring some sort of culture change. Didn’t know and still don’t know what that is about. He just slaps on headphones and stares into oblivion every week and than says things that scream unawareness after every game. I can’t with this guy anymore. It is borderline fraud. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: UK
Age: 60
Posts: 2,929
|
Re: WFT vs. the bye week thread
That's dated Monday. Bye week started Monday, so it's not really news. Post game film review and set up for the weeks practices doesn't really allow much time to do proper season to date evaluation on every play/player to this point. Using the bye week to devote that extra time to it makes sense; not having already started it on Sunday isn't a surprise.
What's disappointing is the lack of play call adjustment to date, even just incremental changes. That doesn't take a full evaluation. If a play keeps getting stuffed, a coverage keeps getting burnt, etc. then stop calling it! Playbooks are big enough now to remove redundant plays without breaking your whole O/D. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|