The 2nd Amendment Thread

[MTK]

Originally Posted by Chico23231

You know people are tired of their business being burned down and destroyed for no good reason. They have just as much right to be their protecting their business…it’s not illegal.

Also, how about the folks who attacked him, all convicted violent felons, leave him alone? People do not have the right to riot. It was not a peaceful protest if you are attacking people.

I think people need to look at the facts in the case, because the media continues to repeat falsehoods

I think folks need to understand there are consequences for your actions…especially in a riot. Multiple people had guns around Kyle as well

Come on, what vested interest did a 17 year old have there?

I'm not even arguing about the fact he got off, I just can't think of any legit reason why he should have been there to begin with.

[Chico23231]

Originally Posted by MTK

Come on, what vested interest did a 17 year old have there?

I'm not even arguing about the fact he got off, I just can't think of any legit reason why he should have been there to begin with.

His vested interest is his community not being destroyed for zero reason. None. People were fed up. He had a right to be there.

[MTK]

Originally Posted by Chico23231

His vested interest is his community not being destroyed for zero reason. None. People were fed up. He had a right to be there.

Stop, you're being ridiculous. Unless he was protecting family or his own private property, a minor with a gun had zero business being there. Bad idea right from the start. And the end result (two dead) proves the point.

[Chico23231]

Originally Posted by MTK

Stop, you're being ridiculous. Unless he was protecting family or his own private property, a minor with a gun had zero business being there. Bad idea right from the start. And the end result (two dead) proves the point.

You might think it’s ridiculous, but he had a right just as anyone else to be there. It’s completely unacceptable to think a person has a right to commit violence, burn, loot, and destroy things thinking they can’t be harmed in the process. Kyle would be home if the rioters woulda stayed home.

You understand he was attacked right? And if he wasn’t attacked those 2 convicted violent felons would still be alive.

Justice was served and Kyle rightly was found innocent.

[MTK]

Originally Posted by Chico23231

You might think it’s ridiculous, but he had a right just as anyone else to be there. It’s completely unacceptable to think a person has a right to commit violence, burn, loot, and destroy things thinking they can’t be harmed in the process. Kyle would be home if the rioters woulda stayed home.

You understand he was attacked right? And if he wasn’t attacked those 2 convicted violent felons would still be alive.

Justice was served and Kyle rightly was found innocent.

Yes it's ridiculous to me you think it was a good idea for a kid, a minor child, to show up to an already volatile situation with a gun. Absolutely fucking ridiculous. Again, he wasn't protecting family or property. He stuck his nose in where it didn't belong and two people are dead because he's an idiot.

[sdskinsfan2001]

Originally Posted by MTK

Come on, what vested interest did a 17 year old have there?

I'm not even arguing about the fact he got off, I just can't think of any legit reason why he should have been there to begin with.

The 2 people that got killed had no good reason to be there either.

[sdskinsfan2001]

2nd rule of fight club, don't go after someone holding an AR15, you are likely to get fucking shot and killed.

[punch it in]

Originally Posted by sdskinsfan2001

The 2 people that got killed had no good reason to be there either.

Yes. They did.

[sdskinsfan2001]

Originally Posted by punch it in

Yes. They did.

No. They didn't. Rioting and looting are not good reasons. I don't care what that started out as, but by the time the shootings happened that was not a protest at that point in time. They placed themselves in positions where they could get shot and they did.

[punch it in]

Originally Posted by sdskinsfan2001

No. They didn't. Rioting and looting are not good reasons. I don't care what that started out as, but by the time the shootings happened that was not a protest at that point in time. They placed themselves in positions where they could get shot and they did.

Lol. That is the police job to determine not some racist cunt bothered by BLM and their supporters with a gun he can barely carry.

Id feel the same way if some anti Trumper went down to the Capitol and pretended to be a cop.