![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 | |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: all up in your business
Posts: 2,693
|
Re: Portis Endorses T.O. Coming To Washington, Would You?
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
A Dude
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Newtown Square, PA
Age: 46
Posts: 12,458
|
Re: Portis Endorses T.O. Coming To Washington, Would You?
Quote:
Are you suggesting that our locker room wouldn't become divided? Your argument isn't making sense. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Germantown, Md.
Posts: 4,832
|
Re: Portis Endorses T.O. Coming To Washington, Would You?
Quote:
Also, in situations like TO when players are asked directly by the Media how they feel about a particular player in a situation like this being welcomed back to the team, they hardly ever mention anything deragatory in reference because that's the smartest way to remain neutral. Some players are naturally going to say they would welcome him back when in reality, that's the farthest thing from the truth. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Germantown, Md.
Posts: 4,832
|
Re: Portis Endorses T.O. Coming To Washington, Would You?
Quote:
Agreed, Seems as though we just went through this same topic just a little while ago, and I really don't see why we continue discussing this guy I don't care who endorses him. Any team would have to want to win very badly to have TO on their team. Granted, he may be a talent but his returns are diminishing because of his charachter. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: all up in your business
Posts: 2,693
|
Re: Portis Endorses T.O. Coming To Washington, Would You?
Where's the poll?
I vote no. His size and skills are undeniably intriguing, but this team is starting to create its own identity, and he would crush that. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Age: 51
Posts: 142
|
Re: Portis Endorses T.O. Coming To Washington, Would You?
Sorry didn't get your quote in there, but it was "NO, NO & NO"
Absolutely! He would ruin the unity that we are starting to develop. No doubt he is an incredible athlete. However, he is not of the mold of a "REDSKIN" I hope Vinny does not get his hands in this----please say NO thanks Mr. Gibbs. Last edited by PhxRedSkin; 12-15-2005 at 06:12 AM. Reason: missed quoting with my reply |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | ||
|
A Dude
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Newtown Square, PA
Age: 46
Posts: 12,458
|
Re: Portis Endorses T.O. Coming To Washington, Would You?
This is an excerpt from the ExtremeSkins chat with Joe Bugel. Doesn't look like Gibbs is interested at all.
Quote:
Quote:
I don't see it happening. As for my own personal opinion, his disruptions would only be worth dealing with if we could have him for less than $2 million per season. That of course would NEVER happen. So basically no, I don't want any part of him. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Minn
Posts: 11
|
Re: Portis Endorses T.O. Coming To Washington, Would You?
That would be AWESOME!!!
TO brings down every team he is a member of......
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Dumfries, VA
Age: 73
Posts: 241
|
Re: Portis Endorses T.O. Coming To Washington, Would You?
Short answer -- NO.
I think we learned that buying big name talent is often just a waste of money if the talent is a prima dona. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 41
|
Re: Portis Endorses T.O. Coming To Washington, Would You?
don't make me :vomit:
next question. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Closet Redskins Fan
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 495
|
Re: Portis Endorses T.O. Coming To Washington, Would You?
I think TO's next contract will have many behavioural clauses, coupled with his age and he will be a model teamate for about two years. If the Skins got him you would win the Division hands down. Dallas would win the Division hands down if they got him. he would change the balance of power in the NFC east.
__________________
I am a complete and unabashed Romosexual. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: chesapeake, va
Age: 62
Posts: 15,817
|
Re: Portis Endorses T.O. Coming To Washington, Would You?
The other day Portis and Santana Moss where invited to TO's birthday party. In the back of my mind I was wondering if there was something up with that. Portis was there but I'm not sure if Moss went.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Greensboro, North Carolina
Posts: 6,766
|
Re: Portis Endorses T.O. Coming To Washington, Would You?
From a talent aspect, absolutely. However, there is more to being a football player than what goes on on the football field. This team is just now getting into the mode of playing like a team - there doesn't need to be any distractions to hender that.
__________________
"Fire Up That Diesel!" |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Another Year, another mess.
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,581
|
Re: Portis Endorses T.O. Coming To Washington, Would You?
YES
I would take TO. I think this year will humble him in my opinion. His mouth got him in trouble, and jepordized his career, you think that doesn't play in his mind. The next team that gets him is gonna have a steal because he will be smarter in what he says. He wants to be payed like a top ten reciever, I can't see why he shouldn't. HE IS A TOP TEN WIDEOUT. Can we give him the money, I don't know. I know we can pay him what he wants, but can we fit him under the cap? If you look at what he would bring to the team. ~Moss would no longer be double or triple teamed. He would free up the run for portis, and with weapons like that Rogers has no option but to succed and become better. If we can keep Greg Williams here for next year, we would become a instant superbowl contender, can't deny the potiential
__________________
That got ugly fast |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Thank You, Sean.
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Gaithersburg, MD
Age: 40
Posts: 7,506
|
Re: Portis Endorses T.O. Coming To Washington, Would You?
Quote:
__________________
#21 |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|