How likely is it Ron and the front office will pursue Aaron Rogers?

[Schneed10]

Originally Posted by punch it in

Idk Schneed.

Look at our schedule results.
Chargers - he makes a winning difference.
Giants - we won
Buffalo - L probably still but who knows if we come out stronger with the best quarterback play instead of the worst.
Atl - we won
NO - he makes a winning difference
KC - game was tight until late - but give us the L
GB - he wins
Denver - we absolutely win
TB - we won
Car- we won
Seattle - we won
LV - we won
Dallas - he makes a winning difference
Philly - he makes a winning difference
Dallas - give us the L, though at that point we were giving up
Philly - he makes a winning difference
Giants - we won

Conjecture ? Sure. But it is Aaron fucking Rodgers vs scrubs. If he was our quarterback this year we win 13 games. Don’t underestimate what he could do for us.

And u can take Davis, 2022’s first rounder who obviously had nothing to do with 2021, and Payne off the team and it dont change a thing. In other words if we had traded two first rounders and Payne for AR prior to 2021 - we win 13 games. Maybe more if you look at each individual game we played in 2021.

You have a 6 win improvement. It's just unreasonable.

Your overall point stands though, he's Aaron Rodgers, he's a HOF player, and we'd be immediately better.

But you've said nothing to refute my point. If you apply your same optimistic view of the difference Rodgers would make, but you substitute in Deshaun Watson or Russell Wilson, how much different are your projected results?

And they wouldn't be 39 going on retired. That's my entire point. The fact that Aaron Rodgers is great is not at all debatable. And neither is the fact that he's fucking old.

[punch it in]

Originally Posted by Schneed10

You have a 6 win improvement. It's just unreasonable.

Your overall point stands though, he's Aaron Rodgers, he's a HOF player, and we'd be immediately better.

But you've said nothing to refute my point. If you apply your same optimistic view of the difference Rodgers would make, but you substitute in Deshaun Watson or Russell Wilson, how much different are your projected results?

And they wouldn't be 39 going on retired. That's my entire point. The fact that Aaron Rodgers is great is not at all debatable. And neither is the fact that he's fucking old.

Your point I am refuting is “we dont win in 2022 with AR”. Not true.

Tell me which of those 6 games you don’t think we win with Rodgers instead of Taylor or Godfrey last year if it is so unreasonable. We are talking about going from worst to first with quarterback play - 6 game improvement is completely in the realm of reason.

He may be 39, but he is playing at an mvp level. He has 3-4 more great years in him.

That being said Ill take Russ or Watson in a heartbeat too, and I don’t think AR would come here anyway. Just saying if he did we would have been instant SB contenders last year or next year, or the year after that. Ill take one and never worry about my expensive, aged , gave up the farm quarterback ever for one second.