Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Commanders free agency thread

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-18-2022, 10:28 AM   #1
MTK
Hail Raiser
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,050
Re: Commanders free agency thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by skinsfan69 View Post
Sure it's fine but it's not like Ron has brought in any world beaters. I'd rather him bring in good durable players over players he's familiar with.
Wasn't Norwell one of the top guards available? He's also a very good player and he's durable. So what's the issue?
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2022, 10:46 AM   #2
EdmundDorf
The Starter
 
EdmundDorf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: UK, South
Posts: 1,926
Re: Commanders free agency thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by MTK View Post
Wasn't Norwell one of the top guards available? He's also a very good player and he's durable. So what's the issue?
He was the highest paid guard in the NFL when signing for the Jags, coming off an All Pro season. Subsequently he has not so much as made a Pro Bowl and the Jags fans have obviously soured on him

The postive perspective for commanders fans, which as he has signed is the best way to approach it, was that I believe his OL coach in his All Pro year in Carolina is now the OL coach in Washington
EdmundDorf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2022, 10:57 AM   #3
MTK
Hail Raiser
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,050
Re: Commanders free agency thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by EdmundDorf View Post
He was the highest paid guard in the NFL when signing for the Jags, coming off an All Pro season. Subsequently he has not so much as made a Pro Bowl and the Jags fans have obviously soured on him

The postive perspective for commanders fans, which as he has signed is the best way to approach it, was that I believe his OL coach in his All Pro year in Carolina is now the OL coach in Washington
Every FA list I've seen has him listed as a top 3-5 option at guard. Clearly there's more to signing him than just the Carolina connection.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2022, 03:30 PM   #4
skinsfan69
Living Legend
 
skinsfan69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,591
Re: Commanders free agency thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by MTK View Post
Wasn't Norwell one of the top guards available? He's also a very good player and he's durable. So what's the issue?
Idk if Norwell was one of the top guards or not. But one of the worst teams let him go. Now Ron signs him for half the money that Flowers is making. But did you get better there? If you sign a lesser player to save money then that is a bad signing.

I would have kept Flowers and worked the cap on some other contracts. Can they put the Wentz contract into later years?

Ron did the same thing last year w/ Moses. I am trying to keep as many good o-linemen as possible because you have a Qb that holds the ball and tends to take sacks. You have to protect your asset that you traded for.

The durability comment was in regards to Samuel. He couldn't play and never had 1,000 yards so so far terrible signing. I'd just play Carter cause he actually can play and is probably 1/10th the cost...lol.

Sorry but Ron the GM so far doesn't impress me.
skinsfan69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:28 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.81717 seconds with 11 queries