The Most Fresh & Cordial Political Thread Ever

[Chico23231]

Originally Posted by Schneed10

LOL

She doesn't need to define 'woman' she just needs to apply the law of the land as written. She's not being nominated as a psychological expert on gender identity, she's being nominated as a Supreme Court Justice.

It was a stupid question that smart people see right through. That's why she answered it that way.

Definitely an interesting answer. Of course this is the first time a politician has attempted to score political points with its base at a nomination hearing.

But I agree, it’s about the law of the land as written. Interesting Biden chose his nomination based on identity…his words, not mine. I think she’ll do fine

[Giantone]

Originally Posted by Chico23231

Definitely an interesting answer. Of course this is the first time a politician has attempted to score political points with its base at a nomination hearing.

But I agree, it’s about the law of the land as written. Interesting Biden chose his nomination based on identity…his words, not mine. I think she’ll do fine

LOL, you're a freaking hypocrite.


chico,..............Can’t define the term woman…she said not a biologist?

Do you need to be a biologist to define woman? You need to be a vet to know what a dog or cat is?

Expect this question going forward…it’s the one that topples retards logic."


the fact you have to use the word "retard" shows just how ignorant you are.
chico,........."