The Most Fresh & Cordial Political Thread Ever

[sdskinsfan2001]

Originally Posted by MTK

If you're ok with ignoring the fact she has openly associated herself with Q, that's on you

If you're OK with ignoring everything positive about her story and its positive impact on our country because of some hashtags, that's on you. #diversity

Anyways, she is only completing a term through January, and will have to run again in a few months. That's a short turnaround to show your true colors once actually in office.

[MTK]

Originally Posted by sdskinsfan2001

If you're OK with ignoring everything positive about her story and its positive impact on our country because of some hashtags, that's on you. #diversity

Anyways, she is only completing a term through January, and will have to run again in a few months. That's a short turnaround to show your true colors once actually in office.

I am ok with dismissing anyone associating themselves to the total crock of shit that Q is.

You don't think that at the very least her character should be questioned? She's backing conspiracy theories and outright lies.

[sdskinsfan2001]

Originally Posted by MTK

I am ok with dismissing anyone associating themselves to the total crock of shit that Q is.

You don't think that at the very least her character should be questioned? She's backing conspiracy theories and outright lies.

You didn't question her character, you posted 1 link and labeled her a wacko. That sounds like a final conclusion, not a question.

Have you researched her character or past or policies before posting that link? How did you even come across it?

I haven't either, but I don't see a wacko based on what little I have read.

[MTK]

Originally Posted by sdskinsfan2001

You didn't question her character, you posted 1 link and labeled her a wacko. That sounds like a final conclusion, not a question.

Have you researched her character or past or policies before posting that link? How did you even come across it?

I haven't either, but I don't see a wacko based on what little I have read.

I don't have to research her character or policies, if she is ok with aligning herself with dangerous conspiracy theories and lies, I'm ok with calling her a wacko.

[sdskinsfan2001]

Originally Posted by MTK

I don't have to research her character or policies, if she is ok with aligning herself with dangerous conspiracy theories and lies, I'm ok with calling her a wacko.

Fair enough.

I'm shocked I wasn't able to change your mind 1%.

That makes about 0 for 1,003,112 times with any democrat in all of these threads.

Maybe next time!

[MTK]

Originally Posted by sdskinsfan2001

Fair enough.

I'm shocked I wasn't able to change your mind 1%.

That makes about 0 for 1,003,112 times with any democrat in all of these threads.

Maybe next time!

Would you be ok voting for a Q supporter?

To me it's like someone saying they are a flat earth believer, my opinion of that person would immediately plummet.

Q is some straight up crazy bullshit

THE PROPHECIES OF Q
American conspiracy theories are entering a dangerous new phase.

[sdskinsfan2001]

Originally Posted by MTK

Would you be ok voting for a Q supporter?

To me it's like someone saying they are a flat earth believer, my opinion of that person would immediately plummet.

Q is some straight up crazy bullshit

THE PROPHECIES OF Q
American conspiracy theories are entering a dangerous new phase.

If I was voting in that race, I would have voted for her.

If she turned into some full on, the only thing she pushes is that stuff, then I wouldn't vote to re-elect her.

But it would be a case by case basis. I don't see her as being some crazy fringe candidate. That doesn't mean that I would vote for anyone that supported it, because they might be.