The Most Fresh & Cordial Political Thread Ever

[Giantone]

Seriously chico ,Cred,SDSkins. How in the hell can you back a moron like this?

https://thehill.com/homenews/media/3...po-nyt-awards/


Pulitzers rejects Trump demand to revoke WaPo, NYT awards


The Pulitzer board commissioned a review of the winning works, but found no reason to pull back the awards.

“The separate reviews converged in their conclusions: that no passages or headlines, contentions or assertions in any of the winning submissions were discredited by facts that emerged subsequent to the conferral of the prizes,” the board said in a statement.

“The 2018 Pulitzer Prizes in National Reporting stand,” the statement continued.

The board said the review followed an established, formal process to review complaints against winning entries.

Trump has pressed for the Pulitzers to be revoked since October, labeling the winning stories “totally incorrect reporting” that “have become worthless and meaningless.”

The board said the requests from Trump and others, who they did not name, prompted the reviews, which were conducted by individuals with no connection to the two papers or each other.

[nonniey]

Originally Posted by Giantone

Seriously chico ,Cred,SDSkins. How in the hell can you back a moron like this?

https://thehill.com/homenews/media/3...po-nyt-awards/


Pulitzers rejects Trump demand to revoke WaPo, NYT awards


The Pulitzer board commissioned a review of the winning works, but found no reason to pull back the awards.

“The separate reviews converged in their conclusions: that no passages or headlines, contentions or assertions in any of the winning submissions were discredited by facts that emerged subsequent to the conferral of the prizes,” the board said in a statement.

“The 2018 Pulitzer Prizes in National Reporting stand,” the statement continued.

The board said the review followed an established, formal process to review complaints against winning entries.

Trump has pressed for the Pulitzers to be revoked since October, labeling the winning stories “totally incorrect reporting” that “have become worthless and meaningless.”

The board said the requests from Trump and others, who they did not name, prompted the reviews, which were conducted by individuals with no connection to the two papers or each other.

Not surprising as there are even worse awards that the board refuses to rescind (NYT's Duranty award is the top example of an egregious award that absolutely should have been rescinded - and the NYT still proudly claims that one in their stats). Oh and Trump wasn't the only one calling for those awards to be rescinded - Journalists from every side of the spectrum were.

[Giantone]

Originally Posted by nonniey

Not surprising as there are even worse awards that the board refuses to rescind (NYT's Duranty award is the top example of an egregious award that absolutely should have been rescinded - and the NYT still proudly claims that one in their stats). Oh and Trump wasn't the only one calling for those awards to be rescinded - Journalists from every side of the spectrum were.

I know that but you have to acknowledge they reviewed it and still gave the finger to trump and the other liars.

[nonniey]

Originally Posted by Giantone

I know that but you have to acknowledge they reviewed it and still gave the finger to trump and the other liars.

Oh he is definitely a liar for the ages, but he wasn't lying on this issue. I still think that refusing to correct/rescind awards given for stories that were based on bad info or lies just further damages the press's reputation (and it already has dug itself to lowest point it has ever been. It needs to stop digging).

[Giantone]

Originally Posted by nonniey

Oh he is definitely a liar for the ages, but he wasn't lying on this issue. I still think that refusing to correct/rescind awards given for stories that were based on bad info or lies just further damages the press's reputation (and it already has dug itself to lowest point it has ever been. It needs to stop digging).

People who aren't in the industry need to stay out of things they don't know anything about and that includes telling them who should and should not get an award.

[Chico23231]

Originally Posted by Giantone

I know that but you have to acknowledge they reviewed it and still gave the finger to trump and the other liars.

Lol…as we know, there wasn’t any Russian collusion, the Steele dos was false and the liars were anyone in congress who claimed to had seen evidence trump colluded with russia.

We know from recent testimony that this was just Democrat oppo and the FBI review it and said there was no evidence long before Mueller came along.

The problem is this, if you are a respectable news organization you are suppose to present the facts and investigate the evidence. The NYT did not…only after the Muller report was released did they admit the Steele Dos was discredited

The NYT pushed a conspiracy theory and false narratives that aligned with their political biased simply because they didn’t like Trump.

Folks actually still believe this Russian collusion nonsense, which is the biggest disinformation political campaign of my lifetime.

And media wonders why we don’t believe them or why our faith in institutions are failing to record lows.

[Giantone]

Originally Posted by Chico23231

Lol…as we know, there wasn’t any Russian collusion, the Steele dos was false and the liars were anyone in congress who claimed to had seen evidence trump colluded with russia.

We know from recent testimony that this was just Democrat oppo and the FBI review it and said there was no evidence long before Mueller came along.

The problem is this, if you are a respectable news organization you are suppose to present the facts and investigate the evidence. The NYT did not…only after the Muller report was released did they admit the Steele Dos was discredited

The NYT pushed a conspiracy theory and false narratives that aligned with their political biased simply because they didn’t like Trump.

Folks actually still believe this Russian collusion nonsense, which is the biggest disinformation political campaign of my lifetime.

And media wonders why we don’t believe them or why our faith in institutions are failing to record lows.

LOL I love how you play the "collusion" BS . Mueller proved Russia intervened on trumps behalf and it was his kids that were the middle men Barr just wouldn't indicted.




What's this we shit??? .............you keep proving you know shit!

[Chico23231]

Originally Posted by Giantone

LOL I love how you play the "collusion" BS . Mueller proved Russia intervened on trumps behalf and it was his kids that were the middle men Barr just wouldn't indicted.




What's this we shit??? .............you keep proving you know shit!

Lol…what? No Mueller didn’t …..and kids were middle man? What are you talking about?

G1, I sometimes picture you as the My Pillow Guy, but with the complete opposite behavior…Bizzaro My Pillow Guy. Instead of endearing love of Trump, you have complete disgust and hate. Instead of My Pillow, you have My Bedpan.

[Giantone]

Originally Posted by Chico23231

Lol…what? No Mueller didn’t …..and kids were middle man? What are you talking about?

G1, I sometimes picture you as the My Pillow Guy, but with the complete opposite behavior…Bizzaro My Pillow Guy. Instead of endearing love of Trump, you have complete disgust and hate. Instead of My Pillow, you have My Bedpan.

chico you're a moron.

https://www.americanbar.org/news/aba...investigation/


Mueller finds no collusion with Russia, leaves obstruction question open



did not take a clear position on whether Trump obstructed justice.

, despite multiple efforts from Russian-affiliated individuals to assist the Trump campaign.”

As far as obstruction, the Mueller report laid out facts on both sides but did not reach a conclusion. Barr’s letter said that “the Special Counsel states that ‘while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.’”




https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-45079377

Trump admits son met Russian for information on opponent

US President Donald Trump has admitted his son met a Russian lawyer in June 2016 "to get information on an opponent", but argues it was legal.

Donald Trump Jr's meeting with Kremlin-linked lawyer Natalia Veselnitskaya at Trump Tower could constitute a breach of US campaign rules, experts say.





what I imagin chico looks like after posting..........

[IMG][/IMG]