The Most Fresh & Cordial Political Thread Ever

[nonniey]

No in his mind the Mueller report doesn't say what it says.

- OMG he edited his post above and removed the no collusion findings part (which is what the Post and NYTs won their Pulitzers for - and was the basis for our discussion).

G1 that is just pathetic.

[Chief X_Phackter]

Originally Posted by nonniey

No in his mind the Mueller report doesn't say what it says.

- OMG he edited his post above and removed the no collusion findings part (which is what the Post and NYTs won their Pulitzers for - and was the basis for our discussion).

G1 that is just pathetic.

LOL, Truly...

Who needs "spin", when you can just go back and delete the parts that show you don't know what the hell you are talking about.

[Giantone]

Originally Posted by Chief X_Phackter

LOL, Truly...

Who needs "spin", when you can just go back and delete the parts that show you don't know what the hell you are talking about.

I get it . You trumpets won't let go ,that's cool.


I just highlighted the parts that prove you need to spin.

[nonniey]

Originally Posted by Giantone

I get it . You trumpets won't let go ,that's cool.


I just highlighted the parts that prove you need to spin.

Ya know G1 if John Belushi got a Pulitzer for his report on the Germans attacking Pearl Harbor, me saying that that award should be rescinded wouldn't make me a supporter of Hitler.

Of course given your posting history your response to that example would be to say it actually was the Germans that attacked Pearl Harbor and to say otherwise is just "spin."

[Giantone]

Originally Posted by nonniey

Ya know G1 if John Belushi got a Pulitzer for his report on the Germans attacking Pearl Harbor, me saying that that award should be rescinded wouldn't make me a supporter of Hitler.

Of course given your posting history your response to that example would be to say it actually was the Germans that attacked Pearl Harbor and to say otherwise is just "spin."

IF,yet the thing is Pulitzer wouldn't do that no matter the if's.

[nonniey]

Originally Posted by Giantone

IF,yet the thing is Pulitzer wouldn't do that no matter the if's.

Damn, the point went over your head.

[Giantone]

Originally Posted by nonniey

Damn, the point went over your head.

Maybe you just suck at trying to make a point?

[Giantone]

Originally Posted by nonniey

No in his mind the Mueller report doesn't say what it says.

- OMG he edited his post above and removed the no collusion findings part (which is what the Post and NYTs won their Pulitzers for - and was the basis for our discussion).

G1 that is just pathetic.

Please find where I have ever said a word about collusion? I haven't yet it's all you and the other trump band wagon fans jump on and you ignore what Mueller did find , just like Barr did. LOL, you're doing it now!