![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 | ||
|
The Starter
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: So. MD
Age: 47
Posts: 1,319
|
Re: Pro Bowl Bound - Samuels, Moss
Quote:
Quote:
Coaches gameplan for Vick and are always attempting to keep him contained. I highly doubt any coach in the league is saying to himself before a Dallas game, "How are we going to stop Bledsoe?". |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 519
|
Re: Pro Bowl Bound - Samuels, Moss
Quote:
__________________
SAY HELLO TO THE BAD GUY........ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: St. Louis, MO
Age: 70
Posts: 868
|
Re: Pro Bowl Bound - Samuels, Moss
F@#% the Pro Bowl. No one watches it anyway. The Skins get no respect. They will just have to earn it by going to the playoffs and winning playoff games. The Pro Bowl selections will follow next year.
__________________
"HAIL TO THE SKINS" |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Propane and propane accessories
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Houston, TX
Age: 57
Posts: 4,719
|
Re: Pro Bowl Bound - Samuels, Moss
Quote:
__________________
Hail from Houston! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Richmond, Va.
Age: 50
Posts: 288
|
Re: Pro Bowl Bound - Samuels, Moss
Dan Patrick gives Brunell some love and says he should have been the # 2 QB behind Hasslebeck and the third QB slot is a toss up between Delhomme, Vick, and Eli, but Brunell should have definitely been voted in because of his play. Could not agree more.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
MVP
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: lancaster,pa
Age: 64
Posts: 10,672
|
Re: Pro Bowl Bound - Samuels, Moss
matty your right on.vick might be the most over rated name in sports,not just football
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
I like big (_|_)s.
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Charlottesville, Virginia
Age: 44
Posts: 19,264
|
Re: Pro Bowl Bound - Samuels, Moss
Ugh. Why are people so willing to slurp Vick and no other worthy names? Like I've never seen people who loyal to one player. Again, I won't deny that he's exciting to watch but that's about it. Yes, his presence in the game DOES make his teammates better, but what is up with everyone defending him for the Pro Bowl this year? People SERIOUSLY have man crushes on Ramsey and some are STILL calling for him to play, but I've never seen loyalty the likes of people with Vick.
__________________
Regret nothing. At one time it was exactly what you wanted. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Hail Raiser
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,050
|
Re: Pro Bowl Bound - Samuels, Moss
Vick is in on name alone. Let's not kid ourselves and try to sugar coat it by pointing to wins or his lack of WRs. It's not like he throws to his WRs anyway.
Vick is a HUGE brand name. He's easily the most marketable name in the NFL today. Fans love him because of his incredible physical talents, and I'm not denying the guy is a freak of nature. But as an overall QB, I'm sorry but I can name a bunch of guys who are better QBs than Mike Vick and who were more deserving of a Pro Bowl nod. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 46
Posts: 1,034
|
Re: Pro Bowl Bound - Samuels, Moss
Chris Cooley should have made the probowl as a TE, what a crock.
Oh well the ProBowl is dumb anyways. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Washington, DC
Age: 38
Posts: 5,688
|
Re: Pro Bowl Bound - Samuels, Moss
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
MVP
Join Date: May 2004
Age: 47
Posts: 10,164
|
Re: Pro Bowl Bound - Samuels, Moss
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Arlington, VA
Age: 41
Posts: 3,109
|
Re: Pro Bowl Bound - Samuels, Moss
How come last week I was wrong for judging people based on stats, which by the way, included wins, but this week all people want to do is use stats to explain why Vick is overrated.
First of all, the Falcons are one of the worst teams in the league without Michael Vick on the field. He may not be a great passer, but he changes games. You can't honestly tell me that you think coaches lose sleep over Mark Brunell or Drew Bledsoe. That's why Vick gets votes. When coaches and players go up against Mike Vick they have to come up with ways to stop him. If I were coming up with a gameplan against the Skins or Boys I would try to make Brunell or Bledsoe beat me. Second, Vick has no one but Crumpler and Dunn on offense. Don't give me that "he doesn't throw to recievers" nonsense. He doesn't throw to them because they're garbage. He has one legit target. The offense is him and Dunn. That's it. Vick is the MVP of his team every single season. Without him, we've seen what happens to the Falcons. Michael Vick changes games and people respect what he can do way more than Brunell or Bledsoe. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Hail Raiser
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,050
|
Re: Pro Bowl Bound - Samuels, Moss
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: So. MD
Age: 47
Posts: 1,319
|
Re: Pro Bowl Bound - Samuels, Moss
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Hail Raiser
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,050
|
Re: Pro Bowl Bound - Samuels, Moss
Quote:
That's about as in depth as you have to get with Vick. He's overrated, simple as that. His numbers are garbage for a QB. So he wins when he's in the lineup... yeah that's great. Are you telling me Dallas or Washington would have won the same amount of games if you took away Bledsoe and Brunell? He's a great athlete, but from a pure QB standpoint his name carries him. The Pro Bowl is a popularity contest most of the time so it's not surprising Vick is in, I just don't think it's justified based on his play. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|