Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


7-5 Post-Game Thread

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-28-2022, 09:14 AM   #1
mredskins
Gamebreaker
 
mredskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 13,231
Re: 7-5 Post-Game Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by punch it in View Post
Taylor definitely almost cost us that game. I mean it certainly wasn’t the D, or the backs. It wasn’t people dropping balls. The coaches did a good job. Taylor had some absolutely awful misses and int’s, and was clearly the shaky part of the team. It just begs the question what if we had solid quarterback play? But yes you cannot make changes now because we are winning . I would love to see him run sometimes instead of forcing balls.

If he looks real bad against the Giants next week, and is holding us back - than Id be all in favor of letting Sam get in the game. We are in the drivers seat for the playoffs. So if it becomes apparent that Taylor is the weak link get him out.
if we are still in a playoff push; CW will be in before Sam if they decide to pull TH.

The problem with pulling TH is that this team really rallies around him, i be afraid if Ron pulled him the air come out the team balloon.
__________________
When life gives you paper jams, turn them into paper footballs!
mredskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2022, 09:19 AM   #2
sdskinsfan2001
Living Legend
 
sdskinsfan2001's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Hanahan, South Carolina
Age: 43
Posts: 20,866
Re: 7-5 Post-Game Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by mredskins View Post
if we are still in a playoff push; CW will be in before Sam if they decide to pull TH.

The problem with pulling TH is that this team really rallies around him, i be afraid if Ron pulled him the air come out the team balloon.
If Heinicke plays like he did yesterday or gets hurt, I'm fine with Wentz going back in as long as he can't reach 70% of the snaps. I'd prefer Howell, but I'd understand the decision.

I'm assuming the 70% doesn’t include playoffs, but I could be wrong.
__________________
"You can be my wingman anytime."
"Bulls**t. You can be mine."
sdskinsfan2001 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2022, 09:37 AM   #3
mredskins
Gamebreaker
 
mredskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 13,231
Re: 7-5 Post-Game Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by sdskinsfan2001 View Post
If Heinicke plays like he did yesterday or gets hurt, I'm fine with Wentz going back in as long as he can't reach 70% of the snaps. I'd prefer Howell, but I'd understand the decision.

I'm assuming the 70% doesn’t include playoffs, but I could be wrong.
i love SH i hope he gets a opportunity but this isn't the season until we are out of the playoff pic.

My though is when CW was in at the start of the season they thought ok we are going to be able to throw more and lean on a NFL starter level QB, that didn't work out. I think now if CW comes back you treat him like TH but it opens the door to more play calls. Defenses know with TH we can't bomb it out, i think CW in keeps the safeties honest and you chuck it a couple times to remind them, that opens the door even more for the RBs.

When the day is done CW is a better QB then TH.

The X factor with TH is that the team really rises up for him, so its a tough call.

I keep CW and TH both on a short leash if they start a game.
__________________
When life gives you paper jams, turn them into paper footballs!
mredskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:52 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.29940 seconds with 11 queries