|
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
12-22-2005, 04:33 AM
|
#1 |
|
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 519
|
Re: Pro Bowl Bound - Samuels, Moss
Maybe the same people that vote for Yao Ming, is voting for M. Vick....I so glad for that brother, making the pro bowl, if Mc Nabb didn't get hurt.....him and Vick would have made the pro bowl and overrated Hassleback would have been out.... He's only in because he's riding the back of Shaun Alexander........Hassleback, pro bowl my ass
__________________
SAY HELLO TO THE BAD GUY........ |
|
|
|
12-22-2005, 06:57 AM
|
#2 | |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Ridgway, PA
Age: 47
Posts: 2,519
|
Re: Pro Bowl Bound - Samuels, Moss
Quote:
 Why would have McNabb have made the pro-bowl, and what is your reasoning that Vick made it? Was it Vick's great touchdown to int ratio of 13td's to 12 int's? Or was it Vick's incrediable completion percentage of 54%? Why would it be so hard, if you are a redskins fan, to be upset that our very own Mark Brunell did not make it? I mean he is having a way better season than Vick is, you do have to admit that. I agree that Hasselbeck and Delhomme(SP) should not have made it, not over Brunell and Bledsoe(SP). Espically not Delhomme, not when Brunell has 2 td's for every 1 int. And yes I will admit that last year I couldn't stand that Brunell was our QB, but you have to give credit where credit is due and Brunell got totally nubbed.
__________________
"I am the best at what I do, and what I do isn't very nice" - Sean Taylor |
|
|
|
|
|
12-22-2005, 03:20 PM
|
#3 | |
|
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 519
|
Re: Pro Bowl Bound - Samuels, Moss
Quote:
__________________
SAY HELLO TO THE BAD GUY........ |
|
|
|
|
|
12-22-2005, 03:42 PM
|
#4 |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Richmond, Va.
Age: 50
Posts: 288
|
Re: Pro Bowl Bound - Samuels, Moss
Vick could be getting the love because all the wins he has produced this year and he helps the Falcons win. Oh that is right they are also 8-6 and not going to the playoffs, so the Vick wins arguement is out the door, and the stats don't support the nod for Hawaii either. If anything he should have been put in the same situation as Cooley, what category do you put him in QB or RB, he beats teams with his legs and athletic ability. Oh yeah he should get the nod because he is fun and exciting to watch kind of like Mack Strong is more exciting to watch than Cooley, not. Even if Cooley was listed as a FB and it was wrong that is what they had him at and he definitely was the best player listed in that category statistically, and exciting.
|
|
|
|
|
12-23-2005, 12:13 AM
|
#5 | |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Ridgway, PA
Age: 47
Posts: 2,519
|
Re: Pro Bowl Bound - Samuels, Moss
Quote:
Its McNabb not Mc Nabb... "What style is that, Vick, Culpepper, Mc Nabb.... you mean that style?" http://www.thewarpath.net/showthread...6&page=5&pp=10 It is two not to... "I have to black sons...." http://www.thewarpath.net/showthread...6&page=6&pp=10
__________________
"I am the best at what I do, and what I do isn't very nice" - Sean Taylor Last edited by Redskins8588; 12-23-2005 at 01:45 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
12-23-2005, 01:35 AM
|
#6 | |
|
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 519
|
Re: Pro Bowl Bound - Samuels, Moss
Quote:
__________________
SAY HELLO TO THE BAD GUY........ |
|
|
|
|
|
12-23-2005, 01:47 AM
|
#7 | |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Ridgway, PA
Age: 47
Posts: 2,519
|
Re: Pro Bowl Bound - Samuels, Moss
Quote:
__________________
"I am the best at what I do, and what I do isn't very nice" - Sean Taylor |
|
|
|
|
|
12-23-2005, 05:47 PM
|
#8 | |
|
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 519
|
Re: Pro Bowl Bound - Samuels, Moss
Quote:
__________________
SAY HELLO TO THE BAD GUY........ |
|
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
