Commanders 2023 Off-Season Thread

[Chief X_Phackter]

Originally Posted by GridIron26

I'm not against the idea of bringing Carr here, as long as we sign him through free agency, not trade.

My ideal plan is to sign a QB and have an open competition between him and Howell during the training camp, and focus on strengthening the team through draft and FA. If the QB doesn't work out in 2023 then we would be in a better position to give up our capitals to get a real QB at the end.

I agree with that plan, but that only happens with the likes of Dalton, Brissett, Mayfield, Darnold, etc. If they decide to go after Derek Carr, and he actually comes here, then he's the starter.

[SFREDSKIN]

All you Howell doubters will be kissing his ass next year, guarantee that!!

[nonniey]

Howell may not be the answer, but whether he succeeds or fails, going with him is the best option for the long term interests of the team. Sign a low price vet back-up, Heinike probably being the best choice for this team.

[mredskins]

Originally Posted by nonniey

Howell may not be the answer, but whether he succeeds or fails, going with him is the best option for the long term interests of the team. Sign a low price vet back-up, Heinike probably being the best choice for this team.

What?

How can he be the best long term option regardless if he succeeds or fails?

Literally makes 0 sense

[FrenchSkin]

Originally Posted by mredskins

What?



How can he be the best long term option regardless if he succeeds or fails?



Literally makes 0 sense

I think I get the point : you can never know for sure if a QB is gonna pan out or not, but having a good QB on his rookie contract is a great situation to be in. So right now, not giving away any assets and giving yourself a chance with a kid that showed he has potential is the best long term option. How it actually pans out doesn't change the parameters of the situation at the point you made the decision.

And I agree with this approach. We may have a franchise QB on the roster, for free, so why gamble assets on something we may not need to buy in the first play ? Especially with the sale and probable change of HC coming up in the near future, I don't want Ron to make any huge future impacting moves.

Envoyé de mon SHV48 en utilisant Tapatalk

[nonniey]

Originally Posted by mredskins

What?

How can he be the best long term option regardless if he succeeds or fails?

Literally makes 0 sense

Makes sense if you can see past 2023 (Which is why I said long term interests - and yes I'm aware most fans can't see beyond the next season - actually that is an American trait). A new coaching regime is almost certainly coming in 2024. Do you really want to saddle a new coach with the old coaches FA QB contract (ie Carr)? And especially if you traded draft picks for him? Howell is on a rookie contract, if in 2023, he succeeds the new coach has a young QB he can resign couple of years down the road, if he fails- not really a major problem as the new coach can then go and choose his own QB.

[MTK]

Originally Posted by SFREDSKIN

All you Howell doubters will be kissing his ass next year, guarantee that!!

With one NFL game under his belt, doubting him is 100% the normal reaction. I don't care if he was the first overall pick, he hasn't proven anything yet.

[mredskins]

Originally Posted by MTK

With one NFL game under his belt, doubting him is 100% the normal reaction. I don't care if he was the first overall pick, he hasn't proven anything yet.

Exactly folks are just getting on the Trevor Lawrence bus now.

I hope SH is a hall of famer!

In reality we need to see more bodies of work.

[skinsfaninok]

Per JP: the team is planning on Howell as QB1 entering the off season but the door is not closed on signing or trading for a QB if the right fit is there.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[mredskins]

Originally Posted by skinsfaninok

Per JP: the team is planning on Howell as QB1 entering the off season but the door is not closed on signing or trading for a QB if the right fit is there.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

So basically it’s anyone’s job at this point

[skinsfaninok]

Originally Posted by mredskins

So basically it’s anyone’s job at this point

They will make SH earn it pretty much which they should


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[skinsfan69]

Originally Posted by skinsfaninok

Per JP: the team is planning on Howell as QB1 entering the off season but the door is not closed on signing or trading for a QB if the right fit is there.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Well of course he is. Wentz is gone and Taylor is a free agent. There's no one else on the roster. He's the off season starter by default.

[AnonEmouse]

Originally Posted by skinsfan69

Well of course he is. Wentz is gone and Taylor is a free agent. There's no one else on the roster. He's the off season starter by default.

Stromm is on the roster, but I wouldn't rate him higher than 3rd string.

I'd say naming him #1 at this point more about making CW and TH positions clear (release and at best #2 if re-signed), thus setting up off-season plans, and simple common sense from RR knowing if the team is sold, at best he's a lame duck and unlikely able to shell out for another high price trade/FA. If nothing else it saves RR fielding dumb "who is the #1 QB on the roster going into the off-season' questions!

[sdskinsfan2001]

There are other things that need to be fixed. But a good or bad offseason is only determined by 1 thing:

Snyder sells = Great offseason

Snyder doesn't sell = We're fucked

[mredskins]

Originally Posted by sdskinsfan2001

There are other things that need to be fixed. But a good or bad offseason is only determined by 1 thing:

Snyder sells = Great offseason

Snyder doesn't sell = We're fucked

this 100