Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Brunell sucks

Locker Room Main Forum


Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-02-2006, 04:22 AM   #1
Luxorreb
^21^
 
Luxorreb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Richmond, Virginia
Age: 54
Posts: 1,630
Re: Brunell sucks

Brunell has started 15 of 16 games and we're in the playoffs. His main target Santana Moss just broke the all time Redskins receiving record by Bobby Mitchell set over 40 years ago. Glad we don't have Vick, Favre, Bledsoe, Brees, McNabb, Collins, Carr, Harrington, etc. We're in!!! Brunell has us in the playoffs!!!
GO REDSKINS!!!
__________________
^21^
Luxorreb is offline  
Old 01-02-2006, 10:49 AM   #2
Sociofan
Special Teams
 
Sociofan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Gainesville, VA
Age: 61
Posts: 380
Re: Brunell sucks

I'm sure glad we didn't have chat boards when Sonny was lofting those floaters late in his career. We would never have allowed him to stay in Washington to do the game-day analysis.
Sociofan is offline  
Old 01-02-2006, 11:24 AM   #3
celts32
Playmaker
 
celts32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Hackettstown NJ
Age: 55
Posts: 2,665
Re: Brunell sucks

I can't even believe I am reading a "brunell sucks" thread after he just led the Redskins to a 10-6 record and a playoff birth. Rediculous...
__________________
Section 116 Row 19

“Goal line, goal line. I-left, tight wing, 70 chip on white.”

www.facebook.com/HackettstownBeerClub
celts32 is offline  
Old 01-02-2006, 03:43 PM   #4
Hog1
Quietly Dominating the East
 
Hog1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Naples, Florida
Posts: 10,675
Re: Brunell sucks

Confession is good for the soul #56 (if not for the ego).
I read a post not long ago suggesting Ramsey has a relatively small contract in 2006. I don't know if his ego could stand it, but it would be nice to keep him, if he comfortable in that role. Brunell ain't getting any younger, and Campbell isn't ready. With the quarterback shortage in the NFL, if traded he may go higher than the 3rd or 4th round pick, as suggested. if not, keep him
__________________
Goodbye Sean..........Vaya Con Dios
thankyou Joe.......
“God made certain people to play football. He was one of them.” – Joe Gibbs
Hog1 is offline  
Old 01-02-2006, 10:37 PM   #5
EternalEnigma21
Assistant Regional Mod
 
EternalEnigma21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Carbondale CO
Age: 46
Posts: 2,958
Re: Brunell sucks

yeah... can we lock this shit up?? I swear every time Im in a good mood and sign on someone else has posted this thing right up at the top of my list... and it never goes away.

Is it me or does Brunell always seem somewhat unhappy in his press conferences... I think we kind of scarred him a bit with him having his family see us (fans in general) booing him off the field last year, and now he can't go anywhere or do anything without seeing us saying how bad he sucks... I'd hate to see him go anywhere, but I can't for the life of me see anyone sticking around after winning 10 reg. season games and taking a team to the playoffs for the first time in 6 years and still having to hear shit about how he sucks.
EternalEnigma21 is offline  
Old 01-03-2006, 12:39 AM   #6
Defensewins
Playmaker
 
Defensewins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 3,767
Re: Brunell sucks

Offiss
Just in case you mixed them up..
Brunell is the one that has been to the probowl and Playoffs. He made it to the AFC Championship game. Wears #8.
Ramsey is the other guy, the guy that has never been on a winning team in th NFL or College. Hasn't been on a winning team since his high school team. Wears #11. Has been sacked alot in his career.
Defensewins is offline  
Old 01-03-2006, 01:01 AM   #7
hooskins
Most Interesting Man in the World
 
hooskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Age: 39
Posts: 8,606
Re: Brunell sucks

Please kill this thread or atleast close it, any admin. Like the others guys said out of respect to Brunell.
__________________
Vacancy
hooskins is offline  
Old 01-03-2006, 07:42 AM   #8
Luxorreb
^21^
 
Luxorreb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Richmond, Virginia
Age: 54
Posts: 1,630
Re: Brunell sucks

PLAYOFFS!
Not what Jim Mora Sr said, but what Sean Taylor said!

__________________
^21^
Luxorreb is offline  
Old 01-03-2006, 08:20 AM   #9
12thMan
MVP
 
12thMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: washington, D.C.
Posts: 11,460
Re: Brunell sucks

Okay, I haven't been to the site in about three days or so. Before the game.

I can't believe the title of this thread, nor people that would like to suggest that Patrick Ramsey would be doing better at this point.

That's just mind boggling!!

Wait, I'm sure there's still a "Clinton Portis is a system back" thread on here too!!

Great win!!
12thMan is offline  
Old 01-03-2006, 08:28 AM   #10
MTK
Hail Raiser
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,050
Re: Brunell sucks

Why are we still having a QB debate?

We're in the playoffs for the first time in years, and yet people still want to imagine what our season would have been like if Ramsey had started.

Who cares, seriously?

We've got a playoff game on Saturday. A playoff game that Mark Brunell helped guide us to. A guy who threw for over 3000 yards and posted an excellent TD to INT ratio, yet we're still debating who should be starting.

I don't get it.

Thread locked, let's talk about the playoffs.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:55 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.43364 seconds with 11 queries