Ukraine mega thread

[CRedskinsRule]

Originally Posted by Chico23231

Tell me the alternative then? What do you mean Russia back off?



…this war started with Biden and he had his entire administration to wage it.



Remember, Biden and EU did NOT give Ukraine an option to allow them into NATO. That’s NOT an option now either. So don’t fret over a existing Biden policy

Russia invaded Ukraine. Period.

Yes Russia gains ground but they lose between 1000 and 1500 people a day. Russia wants you to believe that it's sustainable forever but it's not, their economy was tanking before Trump gave them a lifeline. Most pure military experts think that the Russia would be forced to end war within the next year if you keep supporting Ukraine at the level that the West has been. Before Trump POTUS was known as the leader of the Free World now POTUS is the ass kisser of Putin.

And when it comes to how much we've spent supporting Ukraine it's barely a drop in the bucket against our defense budget, and the toll it has taken on the Russian military is immense.

If you're a Reagan Republican as far as foreign policy is concerned you can't support Trump on his handling of Ukraine.



Sent from my SM-S711U using Tapatalk

[Chico23231]

Originally Posted by CRedskinsRule

Russia invaded Ukraine. Period.

Yes Russia gains ground but they lose between 1000 and 1500 people a day. Russia wants you to believe that it's sustainable forever but it's not, their economy was tanking before Trump gave them a lifeline. Most pure military experts think that the Russia would be forced to end war within the next year if you keep supporting Ukraine at the level that the West has been. Before Trump POTUS was known as the leader of the Free World now POTUS is the ass kisser of Putin.

And when it comes to how much we've spent supporting Ukraine it's barely a drop in the bucket against our defense budget, and the toll it has taken on the Russian military is immense.

If you're a Reagan Republican as far as foreign policy is concerned you can't support Trump on his handling of Ukraine.



Sent from my SM-S711U using Tapatalk

I disagree, most things I’ve read have stated Ukraine lacks the ability with its current force to retake any substantial lost land. There lies the issue.

And this is stuff written prior to the election. Ukraine has lost importance footholds on multiple fronts the last two years.

[CRedskinsRule]

Originally Posted by Chico23231

I disagree, most things I’ve read have stated Ukraine lacks the ability with its current force to retake any substantial lost land. There lies the issue.



And this is stuff written prior to the election. Ukraine has lost importance footholds on multiple fronts the last two years.

They haven't lost significant amounts and they have taken Russian land and held it for over 6 months. If we put a no fly zone to protect their skies at little risk to our pilots, they would re-take their land in time.

FACT: at russia's current rates it would take them 83 years to capture Ukraine and cost them 30,000,000 killed and wounded.

Second fact (not really a proven fact but it is as true as your assertion about russia's advances) if the UK and USA had been true to our word in the Budapest memorandum and put troops on the ground and in the air this war would have been over as quick as the first Gulf war when Iraq invaded Kuwait.

Sent from my SM-S711U using Tapatalk