Dictator Trump Takeover

[Chico23231]

Originally Posted by Giantone

Chico stop the lying and making up BS!

Yes, individuals present at the U.S. Capitol on January 6, 2021, were armed with a variety of weapons, including firearms, according to court records, testimonies, and law enforcement reports. While some claims have suggested otherwise, multiple, evidence-based sources confirm the presence of weapons in the crowd.
Weapons Found and Used on January 6, 2021:
Firearms: Federal court records show that numerous individuals brought guns to the Capitol area, and at least 180 defendants were charged with entering a restricted area with a dangerous or deadly weapon, a category that includes firearms. Some individuals were arrested with loaded handguns in their possession.
Improvised Weapons: Rioters used various items as weapons against law enforcement, including metal flagpoles, batons, stun guns, baseball bats, and hockey sticks.
Chemical Sprays: "Bear spray" and other pepper spray agents were used against police officers.
Other Objects: Rioters used fire extinguishers, wooden stakes, and other items to assault police.
Explosives: Pipe bombs were discovered near the Republican National Committee (RNC) and Democratic National Committee (DNC) headquarters.
Evidence of Armed Individuals:
Court Records: The Justice Department has confirmed that many participants in the January 6th attack were armed with weapons.
Testimony: Former White House aide Cassidy Hutchinson testified that she heard President Trump say, "I don't care that they have weapons. They're not here to hurt me," referring to people in the crowd.
Arrests: Several individuals were arrested with weapons, including guns and ammunition, in the vicinity of the Capitol.
While some individuals have claimed that no weapons were found, the evidence from investigations, criminal charges, and testimony paints a different picture, showing that numerous individuals brought and used weapons during the attack.
US Capitol attack rioters had weapons, including firearms
Jan 16, 2025 — Fact Check: US Capitol attack rioters had weapons, including firearms * On the fourth anniversary of the attack this year, posts o...

Reuters

Capitol Riot Weapons Include Bear Spray, Fire Extinguishers ... - NPR
Mar 19, 2021 — Capitol Riot Weapons Include Bear Spray, Fire Extinguishers And Baseball Bats : NPR. ... Capitol Riot Weapons Include Bear Spray, ...

NPR

RFK Jr. said that Jan. 6 ‘protestors carried no weapons.’ Evidence ...
Apr 9, 2024 — RFK Jr. said that Jan. 6 'protestors carried no weapons. ' Evidence shows that's not true - Poynter. ... RFK Jr. said that Jan. 6 ...

Oh, I wasn’t aware thanks. I was wrong

Just tell me you agree…violence, obstruction, riots, attacking officers, has no place in the streets of Minneapolis. Or do you support this?

Do you agree with the above statement? Or do you support political violence and crimes towards federal law officers?

[CRedskinsRule]

Originally Posted by Chico23231

Oh, I wasn’t aware thanks. I was wrong



Just tell me you agree…violence, obstruction, riots, attacking officers, has no place in the streets of Minneapolis. Or do you support this?



Do you agree with the above statement? Or do you support political violence and crimes towards federal law officers?

violence - wrong
peaceful obstruction - ok
riots - wrong
attacking officers - depends if an innocent life is being attacked by masked law enforcement

There is appropriate civilian disobedience response to excessive police violence. filming is never unjustified and should NEVER be considered justification for excessive force.

Our whole society is founded on government derives it's authority from the people, when government attacks the people en masse (which is what ICE is doing) the people have both a right and responsibility to stand against it.

Sent from my SM-S711U using Tapatalk

Keep in mind i voted for Trump 1, and believe Reagan was our country's best president in my lifetime.

[Chico23231]

Originally Posted by CRedskinsRule

violence - wrong
peaceful obstruction - ok
riots - wrong
attacking officers - depends if an innocent life is being attacked by masked law enforcement

There is appropriate civilian disobedience response to excessive police violence. filming is never unjustified and should NEVER be considered justification for excessive force.

Our whole society is founded on government derives it's authority from the people, when government attacks the people en masse (which is what ICE is doing) the people have both a right and responsibility to stand against it.

Sent from my SM-S711U using Tapatalk

Keep in mind i voted for Trump 1, and believe Reagan was our country's best president in my lifetime.

Action that physically block, hinder, or impede law enforcement or emergency services are not protected as "peaceful protest" and are considered illegal obstruction.

Protest the legal removal of illegal aliens all day and film…we seen exactly this across the country, it’s Fine. But trying to convince yourself that these paid rioters are victims just isn’t it. Nowhere else we see this but Minnesota as others communities are working together to remove illegal aliens along with the federal government.

Why do you or anyone support illegal aliens criminals to freely roam furthering presenting a danger to community? We know the cases, the names…weekly stories. I don’t understand

If Biden would have enforced existing border laws and not let streams of illegals in we wouldn’t be here. Policy matter and we have seen quick results within a year. Crimes, drug deaths, all down.

Is Open Borders a valid policy anyone supports? We have a generous immigration policy, why is doing it the right way unacceptable?

It’s kind of pathetic

[CRedskinsRule]

Originally Posted by Chico23231

Action that physically block, hinder, or impede law enforcement or emergency services are not protected as "peaceful protest" and are considered illegal obstruction.



Protest the legal removal of illegal aliens all day and film…we seen exactly this across the country, it’s Fine. But trying to convince yourself that these paid rioters are victims just isn’t it. Nowhere else we see this but Minnesota as others communities are working together to remove illegal aliens along with the federal government.



Why do you or anyone support illegal aliens criminals to freely roam furthering presenting a danger to community? We know the cases, the names…weekly stories. I don’t understand



If Biden would have enforced existing border laws and not let streams of illegals in we wouldn’t be here. Policy matter and we have seen quick results within a year. Crimes, drug deaths, all down.



Is Open Borders a valid policy anyone supports? We have a generous immigration policy, why is doing it the right way unacceptable?



It’s kind of pathetic

I will always hold these words as truth -

- Give me your tired, your poor, Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free, The wretched refuse of your teeming shore. Send these, the homeless, tempest-tost to me, I lift my lamp beside the golden door!".


To lump all immigrants, even those who came illegally, into a bucket of evil is simply wrong. Instead of rounding up people based on ethnicity, ICE and DHS should be focusing on the lawbreakers. And abidng by the laws themselves. But that is not what is happening. And killing US citizens that clearly are not acting in a life threatening method is not acceptable. ever.

Sent from my SM-S711U using Tapatalk

[sdskinsfan2001]

Originally Posted by CRedskinsRule

I will always hold these words as truth -

- Give me your tired, your poor, Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free, The wretched refuse of your teeming shore. Send these, the homeless, tempest-tost to me, I lift my lamp beside the golden door!".


To lump all immigrants, even those who came illegally, into a bucket of evil is simply wrong. Instead of rounding up people based on ethnicity, ICE and DHS should be focusing on the lawbreakers. And abidng by the laws themselves. But that is not what is happening. And killing US citizens that clearly are not acting in a life threatening method is not acceptable. ever.

Sent from my SM-S711U using Tapatalk

If you do something illegal, aren't you a lawbreaker?

[Giantone]

Originally Posted by sdskinsfan2001

If you do something illegal, aren't you a lawbreaker?

Are all law breakers handcuffed and sent to detention camps are their families deported. All of this without "Due Process"? You run a stop sign what happens I mean you broke the law, you drop a gum wrapper you broke the law, right? Many of the ones being taken have been good tax paying citizens here for years with jobs. So tell me their crime , wanting a better life for themselves and their families by being a good American citizen and doing what every other "good American does"........they at the least deserve due process.


Due process, particularly procedural due process, refers to the legal requirement that an individual must be given a fair and adequate legal procedure before being deprived of life, liberty, or property.


Supreme Court of the United States plays a crucial role in interpreting and enforcing these principles, tracing their roots back to the Magna Carta of 1215, which established early concepts of lawful judgment. The Fifth Amendment, part of the Bill of Rights, and the Fourteenth Amendment extend these rights to protect individuals against actions by the federal and state governments, respectively.

The Court has determined that procedural due process encompasses key elements such as notice and the opportunity to be heard, ensuring that individuals have a fair chance to contest governmental actions that could affect their rights. It applies across various legal contexts, including criminal and civil proceedings, and addresses issues like the adjudication processes of lower courts and the treatment of individuals in mental health institutions. The Court's decisions emphasize the necessity of a neutral judge and the importance of safeguarding individual rights against arbitrary governmental actions. Through landmark cases, the Supreme Court continues to shape the understanding and application of due process in American law, reflecting a commitment to fairness and justice in legal proceedings.

[sdskinsfan2001]

Originally Posted by Giantone

Are all law breakers handcuffed and sent to detention camps are their families deported. All of this without "Due Process"? You run a stop sign what happens I mean you broke the law, you drop a gum wrapper you broke the law, right? Many of the ones being taken have been good tax paying citizens here for years with jobs. So tell me their crime , wanting a better life for themselves and their families by being a good American citizen and doing what every other "good American does"........they at the least deserve due process.


Due process, particularly procedural due process, refers to the legal requirement that an individual must be given a fair and adequate legal procedure before being deprived of life, liberty, or property.


Supreme Court of the United States plays a crucial role in interpreting and enforcing these principles, tracing their roots back to the Magna Carta of 1215, which established early concepts of lawful judgment. The Fifth Amendment, part of the Bill of Rights, and the Fourteenth Amendment extend these rights to protect individuals against actions by the federal and state governments, respectively.

The Court has determined that procedural due process encompasses key elements such as notice and the opportunity to be heard, ensuring that individuals have a fair chance to contest governmental actions that could affect their rights. It applies across various legal contexts, including criminal and civil proceedings, and addresses issues like the adjudication processes of lower courts and the treatment of individuals in mental health institutions. The Court's decisions emphasize the necessity of a neutral judge and the importance of safeguarding individual rights against arbitrary governmental actions. Through landmark cases, the Supreme Court continues to shape the understanding and application of due process in American law, reflecting a commitment to fairness and justice in legal proceedings.

If you commit a crime, you get arrested (handcuffed) and go to jail (detention center). Or at least you should.

I wish people that did litter and didn't pick up their dog's shit went to a detention center. Fuck those people.

I believe that due process is for American citizens. Also, if I broke into your home and stayed there, should I get to stay there until I have a court hearing and all of my appeals are completed? Of course not. You would want me removed immediately. Doesn't matter if I vacuumed and washed my plate after I was done eating.

If you come across the border illegally, you should be returned to your home country. Why was Joe Biden allowed to let millions of people flood our country illegally? But then Trump can't return them to their country? Democrat politicians are all for it because it gives them more power. More house seats now when they get counted for in the census and more votes later when democrats get what they are truly after, legal voting rights for all of them. If it was millions of conservatives from Poland crossing our border, democrats would build a wall to the moon as soon as possible and love enforcing border laws. It is a huge power play for rich democrats (and phony republicans) to get richer and to obtain power for themselves. They don't give one flying fuck about you or me.

Also, you can't claim to be for the lower and middle class and also be an open-border globalist.

[Giantone]

Originally Posted by CRedskinsRule

I will always hold these words as truth -

- Give me your tired, your poor, Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free, The wretched refuse of your teeming shore. Send these, the homeless, tempest-tost to me, I lift my lamp beside the golden door!".


To lump all immigrants, even those who came illegally, into a bucket of evil is simply wrong. Instead of rounding up people based on ethnicity, ICE and DHS should be focusing on the lawbreakers. And abidng by the laws themselves. But that is not what is happening. And killing US citizens that clearly are not acting in a life threatening method is not acceptable. ever.

Sent from my SM-S711U using Tapatalk

Well said!

[Chico23231]

Originally Posted by CRedskinsRule

I will always hold these words as truth -

- Give me your tired, your poor, Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free, The wretched refuse of your teeming shore. Send these, the homeless, tempest-tost to me, I lift my lamp beside the golden door!".


To lump all immigrants, even those who came illegally, into a bucket of evil is simply wrong. Instead of rounding up people based on ethnicity, ICE and DHS should be focusing on the lawbreakers. And abidng by the laws themselves. But that is not what is happening. And killing US citizens that clearly are not acting in a life threatening method is not acceptable. ever.

Sent from my SM-S711U using Tapatalk

We have existing federal laws and an extremely generous immigration policy in place. Doing it the right way is not too much to ask.

[Giantone]

Originally Posted by Chico23231

Oh, I wasn’t aware thanks. I was wrong

Just tell me you agree…violence, obstruction, riots, attacking officers, has no place in the streets of Minneapolis. Or do you support this?

Do you agree with the above statement? Or do you support political violence and crimes towards federal law officers?

We aren't playing your game chico. My feelings are well known to all even if they don't like them.You are the one who has supported political violence at every turn by ignoring it when it's republicans doing it.

[Giantone]

Originally Posted by Chico23231

Oh, I wasn’t aware thanks. I was wrong

Just tell me you agree…violence, obstruction, riots, attacking officers, has no place in the streets of Minneapolis. Or do you support this?

Do you agree with the above statement? Or do you support political violence and crimes towards federal law officers?

I don't like this Women at all but my question is to chico, do you denounce the violence towards her???

https://news.yahoo.com/news/articles...170155769.html

Man arrested in the attack on Ilhan Omar has a criminal history and made pro-Trump posts



MINNEAPOLIS (AP) — The man who squirted an unknown substance on Democratic U.S. Rep. Ilhan Omar at a town hall in Minneapolis has a criminal history and has made online posts supportive of President Donald Trump.

Anthony Kazmierczak, 55, was convicted of felony auto theft in 1989, has been arrested multiple times for driving under the influence, and has had numerous traffic citations, Minnesota court records show. There are also indications he has had significant financial problems, including two bankruptcy filings.

Police say Kazmierczak used a syringe to squirt liquid on Omar during Tuesday's event after she called for the abolishment of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and the firing or impeachment of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem following the fatal shootings of Renee Good and Alex Pretti. Officers immediately tackled and arrested Kazmierczak, who was jailed on a preliminary third-degree assault charge, police spokesperson Trevor Folke said.

Photos of the syringe, which fell when he was tackled, showed what appeared to be a light-brown liquid inside. Authorities haven’t yet publicly identified the substance.



In social media posts, Kazmierczak described himself as a former network engineer who lives in Minneapolis. Among other things, he made comments critical of former President Joe Biden and referred to Democrats as “angry and liars.”

“Trump wants the US is stronger and more prosperous,” Kazmierczak wrote. “Stop other countries from stealing from us. Bring back the fear that enemies back away from and gain respect that If anyone threatens ourselves or friends we will (expletive) them up.”

In another post, Kazmierczak asked, “When will descendants of slaves pay restitution to Union soldiers families for freeing them/dying for them, and not sending them back to Africa?”

Following the shooting of conservative activist Charlie Kirk in September, Kazmierczak for a time changed his profile picture on Facebook to an AP photo of Trump embracing the widow, Erika Kirk.

[Giantone]

https://www.nbcwashington.com/news/n...ns-up/4050305/

ICE arrests of immigrants with no criminal convictions are way up

In the first nine months of the Trump administration, a jump in the number of immigration-related street arrests led to an increase in the number of deportations initiated inside the U.S. —and away from the border — by more than four and a half times, according to a new report.

Researchers from the University of California Berkeley found that Immigration and Customs Enforcement transfers of people from criminal custody to ICE custody as well as street arrests — people who were not in jail at the time — quadrupled over that period.

Much of that steep increase was attributable to street arrests rising by more than a factor of 11 — according to the analysis by the Deportation Data Project at UC Berkeley, a group of academics and lawyers that collect, post and analyze government immigration enforcement data.

Even though the overall number of people under ICE custody increased, the people they arrested in this nine-month period were less likely to have criminal convictions. This resulted in a sevenfold increase in arrests of people with no convictions, according to the report.