Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Champ Bailey

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-14-2006, 11:46 PM   #1
offiss
Registered User
 
offiss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: sparta, new jersey [ northern jersey ]
Age: 62
Posts: 3,097
Re: Bailey

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hail2em
I have to post this. bailey read the play very well but this is the kind of guy i want on my team and that is the tight end from new england never quit on the play and chased down bailey from a 100 yards yeah it might have beenat an angle but he chased him down and never quit on the play...hats off to him

I wanted us to draft him, but I am very happy we went with Cooley.

New England really got screwed in this one, and that return by Bailey was a touchback, but after seeing that pass interference call go against the Pat's at the end of the first half I knew there was no way that call with Bailey was going to be reversed. Pretty tough 2 TD's and the ref's blew them both.
offiss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2006, 11:50 PM   #2
FRPLG
MVP
 
FRPLG's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Age: 47
Posts: 10,164
Re: Bailey

Quote:
Originally Posted by offiss
I wanted us to draft him, but I am very happy we went with Cooley.

New England really got screwed in this one, and that return by Bailey was a touchback, but after seeing that pass interference call go against the Pat's at the end of the first half I knew there was no way that call with Bailey was going to be reversed. Pretty tough 2 TD's and the ref's blew them both.
I think it can be reasonably deduced that the ball went through the endzone but there wasn't indistputable evidence that it. Or even close. The best that could be done was to spot the landing of the ball and the release point and draw a line like they did on TV(not very well but at laest they tried). I don't think that method is in the indisputable evidence category. Maybe wrong call but right on the replay as far as the rules.
FRPLG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2006, 12:08 AM   #3
offiss
Registered User
 
offiss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: sparta, new jersey [ northern jersey ]
Age: 62
Posts: 3,097
Re: Bailey

Quote:
Originally Posted by FRPLG
I think it can be reasonably deduced that the ball went through the endzone but there wasn't indistputable evidence that it. Or even close. The best that could be done was to spot the landing of the ball and the release point and draw a line like they did on TV(not very well but at laest they tried). I don't think that method is in the indisputable evidence category. Maybe wrong call but right on the replay as far as the rules.

The thing was as soon as I saw it happen I said touchback because it looked like a no brainer, so whichever way the ref ruled it it was going to stand, it looked like to me they didn't even consider it. once I saw the replay I knew it was a touchback, but I also knew they wouldn't overturn it, but it was a touchback.

The only thing I could say is his foot hit the pyllon and the ball was to his right in the field of play, it was a simple deduction but I knew it would stand.
offiss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2006, 12:18 AM   #4
skinsfanthru&thru
Playmaker
 
skinsfanthru&thru's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Richmond, VA
Age: 45
Posts: 3,815
Re: Bailey

Quote:
Originally Posted by offiss
The thing was as soon as I saw it happen I said touchback because it looked like a no brainer, so whichever way the ref ruled it it was going to stand, it looked like to me they didn't even consider it. once I saw the replay I knew it was a touchback, but I also knew they wouldn't overturn it, but it was a touchback.

The only thing I could say is his foot hit the pyllon and the ball was to his right in the field of play, it was a simple deduction but I knew it would stand.
I think the biggest beef NE had that game was a similar call the skins have been on the bs side of the past couple years in that bogus PI call on Samuels.
skinsfanthru&thru is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2006, 12:22 AM   #5
offiss
Registered User
 
offiss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: sparta, new jersey [ northern jersey ]
Age: 62
Posts: 3,097
Re: Bailey

Quote:
Originally Posted by skinsfanthru&thru
I think the biggest beef NE had that game was a similar call the skins have been on the bs side of the past couple years in that bogus PI call on Samuels.

That joke of a call gave Denver 10 point's in the final 2 minutes.
offiss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2006, 12:53 AM   #6
FRPLG
MVP
 
FRPLG's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Age: 47
Posts: 10,164
Re: Bailey

Quote:
Originally Posted by offiss
The thing was as soon as I saw it happen I said touchback because it looked like a no brainer, so whichever way the ref ruled it it was going to stand, it looked like to me they didn't even consider it. once I saw the replay I knew it was a touchback, but I also knew they wouldn't overturn it, but it was a touchback.

The only thing I could say is his foot hit the pyllon and the ball was to his right in the field of play, it was a simple deduction but I knew it would stand.
Yeah i agree. They blew the initial call assuming they were even in position to make it. Was anyone even at the goal line is a good question.
FRPLG is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:09 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.21185 seconds with 11 queries