![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 | |
|
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: Any update on Campbell?
Quote:
But hey, if it's easy for you to pin the blame on Brunell, be my guest.
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: sparta, new jersey [ northern jersey ]
Age: 62
Posts: 3,097
|
Re: Any update on Campbell?
Quote:
I will, the fact is if we didn't play perfect football we lost, how many times this year did the defense bail Brunell out and kept him in games? Like I said kansas city shouldn't have even been in that game PERIOD! Yea the defense should shut everyone out, if they don't it's there fault, not Brunells inability to put a team away. How bout getting us a simple first down to ice the game against the Bucs? It wasen't like our defense was strapped with injuries or anything in that game. How bout scoring some points so our defense doesn't have to play hero every week. Yea there was a holding penalty, but there was plenty of time to put us back into field goal range and he failed. It's funny it seems everyone on the team has to pick up Brunell, yet when is he going to return the favor? How many turnovers did our defense overcome by Brunell? Our defense all by themselves were responsible for our last 2 victories. So on saturday when we needed him most, all I hear is if only Rogers made that INT, well I say if only Brunell could play like half a QB we would have won! How bad can an offensive output be before people get it? We set a record, A RECORD, in futility on offense and still won the game against the Bucs, so I ask, who is carrying who? And just for the record Brunell was handed 3 turnovers on saturday! Lot of good it did him! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Yorktown, Va
Age: 57
Posts: 1,587
|
Re: Any update on Campbell?
From what I saw, it looked like Brunnel did fine whenever he was given free reign to chuck the ball (aka Dallas, KC, Denver and even the 4th quarter against Seattle). I think that Gibbs is still feeling out that line between being conservative enough to protect the ball but aggresive enough to win games.
I think Brunnel is good enough to take us all the way if he isn't hurt. At his age, this past year may have been a lucky year in that regard. Just think about the times Brunnel was asked to go out and win the game and what he was able to do as opposed to just thinking about what you would see out of him when we played to protect the ball because our defense was playing lights out.
__________________
Not everything that counts can be counted, and not everything that can be counted counts. A. Einstien |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|