Campbell or Brunell in 2006?

[TheMalcolmConnection]

I voted for Campbell, not because I think Brunell is bad, but because it's time to start working on the future. If Saunders can run some plays that rejuvenate Brunell, then that's great, but as of now, I just feel that Brunell doesn't look to the open receiver.

Do I think we can win with him? Yes.

I also think we can win with Jason Campbell if anything that the coaching staff has said so far is accurate.

[Twilbert07]

Exactly. Look at Pittsburgh. They started their young QB last year, and now he's heading to the Super Bowl at age 23.

[Monksdown]

I dont think you will find many coaches, that short of injury to the vet with those numbers, would agree with you.

And I love you to death, but when you spend billions of dollars on something, and you have a million+ people counting on you. I wouldn't be able to go to sleep whispering to myself, "if ben roethlisburger did it, then so can Jason." Ben is a statistical wack job. You simply can never expect something even close to that.

I dont discount that you could be right, but id say there is probably a 90-98% chance, you are way off.

When somebody performs as advertised, you do not pull him. You do not pull him. I wish Mark was my daddy.

We are building for the Divison Title, and the Superbowl next year. By starting your unproven, no experienced qb, your new goal is to be above .500, and then the playoffs. Mark is playoff bound again next year, homies.

[Monksdown]

and where were you the last 6 months?

[RMSkins]

Originally Posted by Monksdown

I dont think you will find many coaches, that short of injury to the vet with those numbers, would agree with you.

And I love you to death, but when you spend billions of dollars on something, and you have a million+ people counting on you. I wouldn't be able to go to sleep whispering to myself, "if ben roethlisburger did it, then so can Jason." Ben is a statistical wack job. You simply can never expect something even close to that.

I dont discount that you could be right, but id say there is probably a 90-98% chance, you are way off.

When somebody performs as advertised, you do not pull him. You do not pull him. I wish Mark was my daddy.

We are building for the Divison Title, and the Superbowl next year. By starting your unproven, no experienced qb, your new goal is to be above .500, and then the playoffs. Mark is playoff bound again next year, homies.

I completely agree with this Brunell should be our starter for 2006, Brunell should be even better with a legitimate #2 receiver, I think Brunell gives us the best shot at a SB next year. As for Campbell I believe that he will be a great player in the future for us but as for next year Brunell should start and Campbell should wait another year.

[offiss]

Originally Posted by TheMalcolmConnection

I voted for Campbell, not because I think Brunell is bad, but because it's time to start working on the future. If Saunders can run some plays that rejuvenate Brunell, then that's great, but as of now, I just feel that Brunell doesn't look to the open receiver.

Do I think we can win with him? Yes.

I also think we can win with Jason Campbell if anything that the coaching staff has said so far is accurate.

He doesn't look to the third option, why? Because that takes a little longer which means your going to probably get hit and Brunell at his age no longer can take the hit, that was the knock on him when we traded for him around the NFL, they felt he was no longer was willing to hold the ball because he was afraid to be hit.