Does Ramsey Have Some Trade Control?

[That Guy]

Originally Posted by offiss

No way I trade Patrick for a #3 or worse, he's to valuable as a backup. Further more we haven't proved we are capable of finding talent beyond the second round, judging from past history we might as well give him away because we will probably end up cutting whoever we draft with his pick if it's beyond the second round.

running QBs tend to go 1,2, run, as people have brought up the "maybe its brunell" theory of limited WR production from time to time.

chris cooley was a 3rd rounder. the skins' 4th 5th and 7th are till on the team (though not productive in any way as of yet).

and irish, ramsey is 10-14, that's actually REALLY good for a backup. a lot of those wins came under spurrier who didn't really care about having talent on his teams.

[irish]

Originally Posted by That Guy

running QBs tend to go 1,2, run, as people have brought up the "maybe its brunell" theory of limited WR production from time to time.

chris cooley was a 3rd rounder. the skins' 4th 5th and 7th are till on the team (though not productive in any way as of yet).

and irish, ramsey is 10-14, that's actually REALLY good for a backup. a lot of those wins came under spurrier who didn't really care about having talent on his teams.

Is that his record only as a backup or a overall? The number 1 job for a back up is to not lose games by making stupid mistakes (he does not need to win the game, just not lose it) and PR has a knack for making stupid mistakes (which is why Gibbs is done with him).

[That Guy]

Originally Posted by irish

Is that his record only as a backup or a overall? The number 1 job for a back up is to not lose games by making stupid mistakes (he does not need to win the game, just not lose it) and PR has a knack for making stupid mistakes (which is why Gibbs is done with him).

that's his record for games started... how would you differentiate a backup from a starter as far as W/L goes?