Brunell is Bad

[That Guy]

if he performs well in 2006 and has a starting role then thats the downside of not signing him now. campbell will still be cheap and brunell being cut would still save money. If the skins can't afford a good QB (which would be cheap the first 3 years) then they've got bigger problems.

[Huddle]

Originally Posted by That Guy

if he performs well in 2006 and has a starting role then thats the downside of not signing him now.

Are you saying that you think the Skins and Ramsey could come to terms on an extension now?

[That Guy]

Originally Posted by Huddle

Are you saying that you think the Skins and Ramsey could come to terms on an extension now?

no, but in a different life, thats alwayss the downside to not getting extensions done early, you pay more. the upside, of course, if that if they suck, its easier to kick them out the door.

you were discussing the possibility of keeping him, i was following that with the hypothetical that brunell would be easy to toss (cap wise) and campbell would be cheap enough that taking on a good QB contract would still be possible... SO if ramsey did well, the other QBs' contracts would be a non factor is whether you keep him or not.

as far as reality, he's gone regardless of cap sense, cause gibbs likes brunell and campbell, and its impossible to like 3 QBs and keep them all happy (and he's obviously made his choice).