Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Why the Redskins (and everyone else) won't field 30-rookie teams

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-03-2006, 09:02 AM   #1
That Guy
Living Legend
 
That Guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 43
Posts: 17,620
Re: Why the Redskins (and everyone else) won't field 30-rookie teams

I think only the elite players benefit from a dead cap... the role-players could be offered 100k-200k contracts with no health insurance/401k etc and not get any better offers.
That Guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2006, 11:34 AM   #2
D'BOYZ
The Starter
 
D'BOYZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,363
Re: Why the Redskins (and everyone else) won't field 30-rookie teams

Quote:
Originally Posted by That Guy
I think only the elite players benefit from a dead cap... the role-players could be offered 100k-200k contracts with no health insurance/401k etc and not get any better offers.
Exactly the Unions is handleing wrong becasue the ones that have more to lose aren't the star players but the rest of the players taht make the team.

The beauty of the NFL is that this is the only true TEAM SPORT you can get by in basketball with an MJ, Kobe, Lebron and have a good if not great team, you can get by in hockey with a Gretzky, Lemiux, etc, you can get by in soccer with a Beckham, Robinihio,Maradona, pele, etc, you can get by in baseball with a Babe Ruth, Pete Rose, Mark McGwire or a Barry Bonds etc..

But You can't get by and win titles with only a Barry Sanders, Dan Marino, etc... this is a TEAM SPORT not stars sports, also you need 53 player per team that's more then double of any Major Sport.

Peyton Can be Making 100 mill a year in a uncap year if he wants 2 but with out a good line Harrison, Wayne, James, June, Sanders, Freeney, Mathis, His another Richie Manning.
D'BOYZ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2006, 12:02 PM   #3
ArtMonkDrillz
Franchise Player
 
ArtMonkDrillz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Ellicott City, MD
Age: 43
Posts: 8,029
Re: Why the Redskins (and everyone else) won't field 30-rookie teams

Who is Richie Manning?

I feel like this would have have a negative effect on almost all of this year's lower round draft picks. Why would a team even want to sign some unproven guard from UConn (I have no idea why that position from that school popped into my head) when someone like Will Shields is out there on the free agent market? And actually maybe Shields is a bad example because he will demand such a high contract, but say someone like Dockery. If a younger vet is out there, with real NFL expirence, what team would want to sign a 6th rd pick for vitually the same money?
__________________
"Yeah, well, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man." The Dude
ArtMonkDrillz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2006, 12:05 PM   #4
Monksdown
The Starter
 
Monksdown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Warrenton, Virginia
Age: 45
Posts: 1,515
Re: Why the Redskins (and everyone else) won't field 30-rookie teams

Luke, I am your _________.
Monksdown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2006, 12:06 PM   #5
ArtMonkDrillz
Franchise Player
 
ArtMonkDrillz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Ellicott City, MD
Age: 43
Posts: 8,029
Re: Why the Redskins (and everyone else) won't field 30-rookie teams

I could have sworn his name was Archie, but maybe I'm the idiot.
__________________
"Yeah, well, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man." The Dude
ArtMonkDrillz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2006, 01:02 PM   #6
Monksdown
The Starter
 
Monksdown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Warrenton, Virginia
Age: 45
Posts: 1,515
Re: Why the Redskins (and everyone else) won't field 30-rookie teams

ah, the closeness and oldness of the two names allowed them to slip past my normally brilliant and analytical mind.
Monksdown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2006, 02:07 PM   #7
Dantheskinsfan
Special Teams
 
Dantheskinsfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Good ol US of A
Age: 47
Posts: 110
Talking Re: Why the Redskins (and everyone else) won't field 30-rookie teams

Ok, his name was definately NOT RICHIE. Go Cowpies!!
Quote:
Originally Posted by D'BOYZ
Exactly the Unions is handleing wrong becasue the ones that have more to lose aren't the star players but the rest of the players taht make the team.

The beauty of the NFL is that this is the only true TEAM SPORT you can get by in basketball with an MJ, Kobe, Lebron and have a good if not great team, you can get by in hockey with a Gretzky, Lemiux, etc, you can get by in soccer with a Beckham, Robinihio,Maradona, pele, etc, you can get by in baseball with a Babe Ruth, Pete Rose, Mark McGwire or a Barry Bonds etc..

But You can't get by and win titles with only a Barry Sanders, Dan Marino, etc... this is a TEAM SPORT not stars sports, also you need 53 player per team that's more then double of any Major Sport.

Peyton Can be Making 100 mill a year in a uncap year if he wants 2 but with out a good line Harrison, Wayne, James, June, Sanders, Freeney, Mathis, His another Richie Manning.
Dantheskinsfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:09 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.16191 seconds with 11 queries