Does Lloyd's "attitude" bother anyone?

SmootSmack · 03-11-2006, 04:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JoeRedskin

Damn, this whole mod as an arch-nemesis thing is starting to really piss me off. It's like fighting the matrix. (Well, except TAFKAS is dumber than Keanu).

Excellent dude...wait, what?

MTK · 03-11-2006, 04:15 PM

What's up with the Parrot avatar there, JoeRedskin?

SmootSmack · 03-11-2006, 04:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mattyk72

What's up with the Parrot avatar there, JoeRedskin?

Strange isn't it

jdlea · 03-11-2006, 04:16 PM

I actually like that avatar...

JoeRedskin · 03-11-2006, 04:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mattyk72

What's up with the Parrot avatar there, JoeRedskin?

Ask your buddy TAFKAS, you egomaniacal mod. Both of you need to curb your powers and use them for good rather than the self-centered incompetent evil you now claim as your own.

SmootSmack · 03-11-2006, 04:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JoeRedskin

Ask your buddy TAFKAS, you egomaniacal mod. Both of you need to curb your powers and use them for good rather than the self-centered incompetent evil you now claim as your own.

You know what, you're not good enough for the Parrot avatar. Let's find you a more fitting one

Dirtbag59 · 03-11-2006, 09:02 PM

GOOSEFRABA GOOSEFRABA GOOSEFRABA.

Oh yeah, Lloyds attitude doesn't bother me.

jermus22 · 03-11-2006, 10:30 PM

Even when we had that awesome Gibbs team from 1991-92, two stars (Gary Clark and Wilber Marshall) were occasionally known for opening their mouths too much. If Lloyd's biggest problem is that he said T.O. was bad for S.F., I don't think he'll be a huge problem for the team. Glad we added some young talent to the team (also glad we re-signed Rock and released Raymer, Bowen, and Tupa). Sad to see Harris go since he was a good nickelback, but his contract would've been too much.

That Guy · 03-11-2006, 11:34 PM

grr, that was a secret. NO SOUP FOR YOU!

That Guy · 03-12-2006, 12:40 AM

basically right now we have a #1, #1.5, #2.5, #4 (thrash), #6 (brown), and #2000 (take wild guess here) WR on the roster. randle would be a #2.5, but he's really better as a #3.

if we get randle i don't know how you'd keep them all happy though. moss wouldn't care and talent wise, you have a clear #2... patten and randle are both very good #3s though and we simply have not run 4 WR sets here, and we don't use many 3 WR sets either.

Dirtbag59 · 03-12-2006, 12:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by That Guy

basically right now we have a #1, #1.5, #2.5, #4 (thrash), #6 (brown), and #2000 (take wild guess here) WR on the roster. randle would be a #2.5, but he's really better as a #3.

if we get randle i don't know how you'd keep them all happy though. moss wouldn't care and talent wise, you have a clear #2... patten and randle are both very good #3s though and we simply have not run 4 WR sets here, and we don't use many 3 WR sets either.

Exactly. We'd be better off with Cooley, Moss, Lloyd, and Randle El on the Field than Patten instead of Cooley. BTW I like the numbering system. Puts things in perspective for morons like me.

03-11-2006, 09:02 PM	#7
Dirtbag59 Naega jeil jal naga Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Atlanta, Georgia From: Silver Spring, Maryland Age: 41 Posts: 14,750	Re: Does Lloyd's "attitude" bother anyone? GOOSEFRABA GOOSEFRABA GOOSEFRABA. Oh yeah, Lloyds attitude doesn't bother me. __________________ "It's nice to be important, but its more important to be nice." - Scooter "I feel like Dirtbag has been slowly and methodically trolling the board for a month or so now." - FRPLG

03-11-2006, 10:30 PM	#8
jermus22 Special Teams Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Frankfort, KY Age: 44 Posts: 336	Re: Does Lloyd's "attitude" bother anyone? Even when we had that awesome Gibbs team from 1991-92, two stars (Gary Clark and Wilber Marshall) were occasionally known for opening their mouths too much. If Lloyd's biggest problem is that he said T.O. was bad for S.F., I don't think he'll be a huge problem for the team. Glad we added some young talent to the team (also glad we re-signed Rock and released Raymer, Bowen, and Tupa). Sad to see Harris go since he was a good nickelback, but his contract would've been too much. __________________ Win it in the trenches.

03-11-2006, 11:34 PM	#9
That Guy Living Legend Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: VA Age: 43 Posts: 17,620	Re: Does Lloyd's "attitude" bother anyone? grr, that was a secret. NO SOUP FOR YOU!

03-12-2006, 12:40 AM	#10
That Guy Living Legend Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: VA Age: 43 Posts: 17,620	Re: Does Lloyd's "attitude" bother anyone? basically right now we have a #1, #1.5, #2.5, #4 (thrash), #6 (brown), and #2000 (take wild guess here) WR on the roster. randle would be a #2.5, but he's really better as a #3. if we get randle i don't know how you'd keep them all happy though. moss wouldn't care and talent wise, you have a clear #2... patten and randle are both very good #3s though and we simply have not run 4 WR sets here, and we don't use many 3 WR sets either.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

03-11-2006, 04:15 PM	#2
MTK Hail Raiser Join Date: Feb 2004 Age: 53 Posts: 100,121	Re: Does Lloyd's "attitude" bother anyone? What's up with the Parrot avatar there, JoeRedskin? __________________ Support The Warpath! \| Warpath Shop

03-11-2006, 04:16 PM	#4
jdlea Playmaker Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Arlington, VA Age: 42 Posts: 3,109	Re: Does Lloyd's "attitude" bother anyone? I actually like that avatar...

Does Lloyd's "attitude" bother anyone?

Locker Room Main Forum