Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Wynn cut (maybe)

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-14-2006, 09:26 PM   #1
TrustinGibbs
Special Teams
 
TrustinGibbs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Wilmington, NC
Age: 61
Posts: 104
Re: Wynn cut (maybe)

I think they's cut Patten before Wynn. You can never have enough defensive line depth. Wynn like Daniels can also play inside. GW is going to have a alot of versitile players this season, something he loves. He is known as one of the leaders is in this lockeroom Gibbs respects that.


Patten on the other hand has two strikes against him. One, he cannot play special teams...McCants couldn't or wouldn't...where did that get him as the 4th reciever...out the door. Two, Gibbs has always had a low tolerace for guys who stir things up in the Press. Could the fact that he gets paid way too much to be a 4th reciever be strike three...we'll see soon enough.
TrustinGibbs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2006, 09:30 PM   #2
That Guy
Living Legend
 
That Guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 43
Posts: 17,620
Re: Wynn cut (maybe)

Quote:
Originally Posted by TrustinGibbs
I think they's cut Patten before Wynn. You can never have enough defensive line depth. Wynn like Daniels can also play inside. GW is going to have a alot of versitile players this season, something he loves. He is known as one of the leaders is in this lockeroom Gibbs respects that.


Patten on the other hand has two strikes against him. One, he cannot play special teams...McCants couldn't or wouldn't...where did that get him as the 4th reciever...out the door. Two, Gibbs has always had a low tolerace for guys who stir things up in the Press. Could the fact that he gets paid way too much to be a 4th reciever be strike three...we'll see soon enough.
he hasn't stirred anything up, and he's a MUCH MUCH better WR than mccants and unlike mccants, football is his priority.
That Guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2006, 09:35 PM   #3
RobH4413
Wildcard Bitches
 
RobH4413's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Bethesda, MD
Age: 41
Posts: 2,638
Re: Wynn cut (maybe)

Quote:
Originally Posted by That Guy
he hasn't stirred anything up, and he's a MUCH MUCH better WR than mccants and unlike mccants, football is his priority.
agreed, lets not forget... patten is still a good receiver. I would have been appeased w/ a receiving corps of just Lloyd, Moss, Patten... etc. Would I rather have randel el... of course, I just didn't think it was going to happen.

I think right now our focus should be depth at CB, LB, OL, DL... thats pretty much accepted by everyone I think. Lets not have another instance of sub-par CB's not being able to fill in for an injured Springs. That got a little ridiculous.
RobH4413 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:01 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.57700 seconds with 11 queries