Who starts at QB?

[#56fanatic]

Originally Posted by scowan

Though we didn't need Ramsey on the team (he played only sparingly in blowouts the remainder of the season), that couldn't have been clear in late September, when the Jets were making overtures. Keeping Ramsey wasn't a question of Gibbs trying to screw Ramsey or anyone else, it was Gibbs trying to field the best roster he could in 2005.

I beg to differ about Ramsey. Once the season started, we DID need him. Jason Campbell was not ready to step in should Brunell have gone down and we basically had two starters to work with. I also agree with other fans on this site that believe Ramsey was given every opportunity to be the starter and he just did not do enough to make it happen. That is why the Gibbs decision was so tough to make and so contriversial.[/QUOTE]

I dont know anybody is saying we didn't need him. What I am saying is he obviously wasn't in any of the long term plans for the Redskins. What we are saying is we could have gotten a pretty good draft pick for him last year, instead of getting nothing this year. Gibbs always wants two, if not three good QBs, so keeping him was better than having a rookie as the #2, no doubt.