Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Would you accept TO?

Locker Room Main Forum


 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 03-17-2006, 01:45 AM   #8
Portis26Fan
Camp Scrub
 
Portis26Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Los Angeles CA
Age: 46
Posts: 21
Re: Would you accept TO?

Quote:
Originally Posted by hooskins
Ok so now that TO is 99.9% on the Dallas Cowboys, I pose a question. If you were a Dallas fan would you accept TO, after he disrespected your entire francise(star incident)? Actually let me change that;if any of us were Cowboys fans, we would probably kill ourselves. Lets say TO did the star thing at our stadium midfield. Would you ever accept this player on your team? I was shocked at this Cowboys forum, because there were a good amount of people that had changed their avatars to TO ones, and were super excited about him. As a true fan, I would never ever accept a player on my team of that nature, after he did something like that. I understand he might help them win, but real fans know that winning is great, but not everything. Real fans know that being a real fan is having respect for your team, and getting TO is not respectful towards the Cowboys. What would guys do?
i would take T.O. i mean yeah the guy has problems at times, but hes a winner. he can put a team on his shoulders if it's nessesary.
Portis26Fan is offline   Reply With Quote
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:31 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.61181 seconds with 11 queries