Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Redskins, Jaguars interested in Ogunleye

Locker Room Main Forum


 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 06-21-2004, 01:51 PM   #10
MonkManiac
Special Teams
 
MonkManiac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA/DC
Age: 43
Posts: 180
Quote:
Originally Posted by SKINSnCANES
If we keep getting players we dont draft it will be hard to have depth because we will have so many huge contracts. Rookies dont get huge contracts. Id like us to get him but the fact we havent had many young talents in recent years that we are drafting is going to hurt us. Gardner is almost due for a new contract. Smoot is due after this season. Ramsey has two years left on his rookie contract. We arent going to be able to keep those players and have depth if we have a lot of big name players. Players arent gong to want to redo their contracts every three years.
Good call about rookie contracts, but: do we want to give Gardner another contract? What about Smoot for that matter? I'd like to see how Smoot does this year with no Champ and more safety support; I love the guy, but if he's looking to hold out for big money, he has yet to really prove himself. Ogunleye is solid addition to the defensive front, but nobody wants to mortgage the future on him, whether it is with draft picks or with big cap numbers.
MonkManiac is offline   Reply With Quote
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:01 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 1.44441 seconds with 11 queries