Brunell vs. Bledsoe

[Huddle]

Schneed10

I'm not missing that. Go back to post #22 where I clearly state what the cause is for Bledsoe's higher INTs and Sacks compared to Brunell.

You didn't confuse cause and effect in Post 22. You confused it in offering that list correlating winning with the turnover ratio.

At some point you're going to have to acknowledge that stats, when analyzed correctly, tell the tale.

All it will take is a convincing argument.

You seem to eschew stats in favor of football analysis. It seems to be plain as day to me what the cause is for all of Bledsoe's sacks.

There are multiple causes for sacks, interceptions, or any stat you have. But in order to measure individual performance, we have to isolate those somehow. Since that can't be done, the stats are almost useless.

I said almost.

The chief value I see for them is to aggravate the hell out of your debate opponents since one can prove any position, no matter how dumb, with a few selected stats.