Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Brunell vs. Bledsoe

Locker Room Main Forum


Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-22-2006, 06:30 PM   #1
Huddle
Special Teams
 
Huddle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 352
Re: Brunell vs. Bledsoe

That Guy

Quote:
this whole thread went stupid. you claim any dissenting view is strictly opinion, yet whatever your opinion happens to be is fact. Its worthless argueing cause you're being an f/ing brick wall and logic is on the other side.
You have a tough time staying civil when people don't agree with you...don't you?

Quote:
when you have multiple variables, you make multiple equations and you CAN find out A, B, C or D individually from them. that's basic math.
Right, basic math with a false analogy. What we're talking about here is more like trying to solve an equation where there are no givens. We can think of five or six factors which can influence the statistic and we can't isolate and accurately measure any of them.

Quote:
portis in washington still put up monsster numbers. its not like his stats got cut in half. situation does play a role, but like i said, the individual player plays a much bigger role on his own statline.
Probably but if you offered a percentage on how much to give the player's performance, you'd have to reach behind you to find it.

Quote:
portis went from 1500 to 1300, and next year i bet he goes back up. Fact is, he stayed above 1300 every season. some backs can't break 800 yards, some back never get 1000. denver switched backs, but kept the system (and got better QB play), and yet the replacements weren't as good...
Tatum Bell had fewer carries but a much higher YPC. does that stat prove he was better?

Quote:
that must mean that portis is better, and, OMGWTFLOLZ!!!! the STATS bear that out.
Why stop there? You can prove Clinton's better than Jim Brown if you choose your stats carefully.
Huddle is offline  
Old 03-22-2006, 06:35 PM   #2
hooskins
Most Interesting Man in the World
 
hooskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Age: 39
Posts: 8,606
Re: Brunell vs. Bledsoe

I think the main problem with both QB's is that they were VERY inconsistent throughout the year. Luckily, for us, Bledsoe became more incosistent towards the end of the season, and that is what cost the Cowboys a playoff spot, which Brunell kicked it up a notch towards the end of the regular season. The point being, on any givening weekend both are as likely to throw 4 TDS and 0 INTs as they are to throw 1 TD and 3 INTS...
__________________
Vacancy
hooskins is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:40 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 1.08902 seconds with 11 queries