rooting for Goliath

[Huddle]

That Guy

please point it out. I see you said its important to spend to the limit after someone else brought it up, but i definately didn't see anything about how talent at starting positions are more important even if it rubs against the price/performance thing a bit.

Did you read my response? How am I supposed to point out something that was omitted (along with dozens of other points less important than the basic strategy)?

As for the spending limit, I made two references to it BEFORE you brought it up as though it had never been discussed.

[That Guy]

Originally Posted by Huddle

That Guy



Did you read my response? How am I supposed to point out something that was omitted (along with dozens of other points less important than the basic strategy)?

As for the spending limit, I made two references to it BEFORE you brought it up as though it had never been discussed.

you don't think its important to max out your starters talent? and if someone else brings it up, they should be shot down for it? please don't start this pointless bickering crap again.

and i never said you didn't bring it up before I said something, but you didn't bring it up before someone else did. You're always on people for twisting your words, so let's not do that.

[Huddle]

That Guy

you don't think its important to max out your starters talent? and if someone else brings it up, they should be shot down for it? please don't start this pointless bickering crap again

.

I "shot you down" for asking me to point out something that I had already told you that I had intentionally omitted. Why can't you simply admit that you mis-read my post? It's not a sin.

and i never said you didn't bring it up before I said something, but you didn't bring it up before someone else did. You're always on people for twisting your words, so let's not do that.

Actually, I DID bring up the spending limit before Schneed mentioned it. In fact, he put the sentence in bold type and quoted me on it. So, you were wrong in your first post on this nitpicky point and wrong again in the one I've quoted here.

[That Guy]

Originally Posted by Huddle

That Guy

.

I "shot you down" for asking me to point out something that I had already told you that I had intentionally omitted. Why can't you simply admit that you mis-read my post? It's not a sin.



Actually, I DID bring up the spending limit before Schneed mentioned it. In fact, he put the sentence in bold type and quoted me on it. So, you were wrong in your first post on this nitpicky point and wrong again in the one I've quoted here.

first gtrip is the one that mentioned before you edited your post, so you may think thats nitpicking, but it alsso means you were wrong.

and nowhere is it articulated or mentioned that you intentionally omitted anything, nor was that point stated anywhere else. I'm glad no one is allowed to add anything onto anything you say without having you do this retarded shit on them. I most clearly did not mis read your post and you never said anything regarding that point and for some reason you're acting like i insulted your family.

get a life.

[gibbsisgod]

Originally Posted by That Guy

first gtrip is the one that mentioned before you edited your post, so you may think thats nitpicking, but it alsso means you were wrong.

and nowhere is it articulated or mentioned that you intentionally omitted anything, nor was that point stated anywhere else. I'm glad no one is allowed to add anything onto anything you say without having you do this retarded shit on them. I most clearly did not mis read your post and you never said anything regarding that point and for some reason you're acting like i insulted your family.

get a life.

[That Guy]

Originally Posted by gibbsisgod

yeah, well, i think its ****ing retarded too, but if he's going to start with that point by point bullshit and assume i'm insulting him or that I'm not allowed to post without his permission, he can kiss off.

[gibbsisgod]

Originally Posted by That Guy

yeah, well, i think its ****ing retarded too, but if he's going to start with that point by point bullshit and assume i'm insulting him or that I'm not allowed to post without his permission, he can kiss off.

true, very true

[Huddle]

That Guy

first gtrip is the one that mentioned before you edited your post, so you may think thats nitpicking, but it also means you were wrong.

Wrong about what?

Now, I think I understand what's going on.

Man, I understand you are bearing a grudge but do you really want to accuse me of lying over such a trivial matter? In Post 38, I wrote to GTripp: I added a line to the post you quoted before I saw yours. Naturally, to maximize the team's roster value, the money has to be spent up to the limit.

But you think I lied... and only edited my post after reading GTripp's post. That's it isn't it?

If that's what it is, why would you think that? Is that something you might do in the same position?

and nowhere is it articulated or mentioned that you intentionally omitted anything, nor was that point stated anywhere else.

My Post 49 to you...in response to the point you made: I explained a basic strategy in a couple of sentences. There were lots of lesser points omitted.


Let's give this up. Shall we?

[That Guy]

Originally Posted by Huddle

That Guy



Wrong about what?

Now, I think I understand what's going on.

Man, I understand you are bearing a grudge but do you really want to accuse me of lying over such a trivial matter? In Post 38, I wrote to GTripp: I added a line to the post you quoted before I saw yours. Naturally, to maximize the team's roster value, the money has to be spent up to the limit.

But you think I lied... and only edited my post after reading GTripp's post. That's it isn't it?

If that's what it is, why would you think that? Is that something you might do in the same position?



My Post 49 to you...in response to the point you made: I explained a basic strategy in a couple of sentences. There were lots of lesser points omitted.


Let's give this up. Shall we?

please tell where exactly you got the idea i said you were lying, cause i sure don't see or remember it?

Yeah, guess what, I made a point (maximize your starters talent, ignore price/performance if you're still under cap when the thift players are gone) that counteracts the whole price/performance over everything else arguement, and regardless of what you thought about it, i think its a valid point and i don't care whether you personally approve of it.

Whether you chose to omit it or not, it wasn't mentioned, and it was a reasonable point, so I don't need the shit treatment everytime i feel like posting.

seriously, maximize talent? like you needed to waste 20 posts to say that? should i scold you for having a post over 2 words now because I decided to omit everything else, so its somehow illegal for anyone else to bring anything else up, lest i not be as smart as them? Cause that's what this looks like to me.