How Will Campbell Be Handled?

[SmootSmack]

Here's a stat for you. Huddle has started 12 threads since joining us. And 4 have been locked. With quite possibly a 5th on the way.

That has to be some sort of record.

[PSUSkinsFan21]

Originally Posted by TAFKAS

Here's a stat for you. Huddle has started 12 threads since joining us. And 4 have been locked. With quite possibly a 5th on the way.

That has to be some sort of record.

But there are too many variables that you're not taking into account in your statistics.......so they're irrelevant.

[SmootSmack]

Originally Posted by PSUSkinsFan21

But there are too many variables that you're not taking into account in your statistics.......so they're irrelevant.

Good point. Let's platoon and alternate posts here SkinsFan21. I'll start

"I think that the key to Brunell's success this year will be the development of...."

All right, you take it from there for a sentence or two and I'll pick up on it. This is sooo creative.

[GTripp0012]

Originally Posted by TAFKAS

"I think that the key to Brunell's success this year will be the development of...."

I'm not SkinsFan21, but I can finish that sentence. It's not about the development of anything. He and the people around him need to stay healthy. Thats it.

[PSUSkinsFan21]

Originally Posted by TAFKAS

Good point. Let's platoon and alternate posts here SkinsFan21. I'll start

"I think that the key to Brunell's success this year will be the development of...."

All right, you take it from there for a sentence or two and I'll pick up on it. This is sooo creative.

....more efficient ways of distributing beer to the fans at FedEx Field."

Oops, was that a fumble on my part? I'm sorry, I'm still a bit wet behind the ears.......maybe we should have stuck to the veteran poster finishing this drive off.

[gibbsisgod]

Originally Posted by PSUSkinsFan21

....more efficient ways of distributing beer to the fans at FedEx Field."

Oops, was that a fumble on my part? I'm sorry, I'm still a bit wet behind the ears.......maybe we should have stuck to the veteran poster finishing this drive off.

i believe that may be an ad hominem attack

[SmootSmack]

Originally Posted by PSUSkinsFan21

....more efficient ways of distributing beer to the fans at FedEx Field."

Oops, was that a fumble on my part? I'm sorry, I'm still a bit wet behind the ears.......maybe we should have stuck to the veteran poster finishing this drive off.

Either that...or you've struck on an idea so ahead of our time. Better beer distribution=playoffs!

[PSUSkinsFan21]

Originally Posted by TAFKAS

Either that...or you've struck on an idea so ahead of our time. Better beer distribution=playoffs!

Ok, let's go with this. Better beer distribution = louder and rowdier fans = more difficulty for opposing offenses = we get the ball back more quickly = Brunell gets more opportunities to succeed = playoffs! I think it's one of the more supportable positions taken on this thread so far.

[gibbsisgod]

Originally Posted by TAFKAS

Here's a stat for you. Huddle has started 12 threads since joining us. And 4 have been locked. With quite possibly a 5th on the way.

That has to be some sort of record.

that is an irrelevant stat

[Schneed10]

Originally Posted by TAFKAS

Here's a stat for you. Huddle has started 12 threads since joining us. And 4 have been locked. With quite possibly a 5th on the way.

That has to be some sort of record.

Yeah that was exactly my point before. Huddle I didn't enter this thread just to take a shot at you. I just intended to point out that most threads you are a part of become pointless debates, and include a lot of angry words tossed about. Sure it takes two to tango, and if I get into it with you again on this site, I'm sure it will be partly my fault. But there is a theme developing here don't you think? I don't see these pointless debates occurring between TAFKAS and PSU, or Malcolm and Daseal, or Matty and Cancuck. You're the common thread. That's not a shot at you, that's stating fact.

[Huddle]

Originally Posted by TAFKAS

Here's a stat for you. Huddle has started 12 threads since joining us. And 4 have been locked. With quite possibly a 5th on the way.

That has to be some sort of record.

Another deceptive stat.

I challenge you to dig further in your research and target the agressors, those who take perfectly good threads and turn them into harsh personal exchanges.

Right now, you're like the ref who flags the player who retaliates rather than the one who threw the first punch.

[SmootSmack]

Originally Posted by Huddle

Another deceptive stat.

I challenge you to dig further in your research and target the agressors, those who take perfectly good threads and turn them into harsh personal exchanges.

Right now, you're like the ref who flags the player who retaliates rather than the one who threw the first punch.

I was only joking with you, however...

I didn't follow the "rooting for Goliath" thread so no comment there

In my opinion, the "DVOA Statistics" thread was your attempt to continue a pointless debate that had already been locked in the "Brunell vs. Bledsoe" thread. The mods locked it for a reason. To start another thread on realtively the same issue wasn't the brightest move.

Plus in this post seemed like you were stating that there are a lot of "know-it-alls" here. I think you tend to confuse "know-it-all" with "don't agree with Huddle"

You didn't start the "Brunell vs. Bledsoe" thread but you can't deny you had an instrumental role in its demise.

Again, I was just messing with you. But I can't be the only one who sees that threads you're involved in tend to take odd turns.

[Huddle]

TAFKAS

You didn't start the "Brunell vs. Bledsoe" thread but you can't deny you had an instrumental role in its demise.

No denial; but to be candid, the emotional reaction I got surprised me when I simply remarked that IMO conventional football stats are almost useless. I was made to feel like I'd just informed a kindergarten class that there was no Santa.

Again, I was just messing with you. But I can't be the only one who sees that threads you're involved in tend to take odd turns.

Sure that's fine. I love controversy, but these debates would be a whole lot more fun if we just aggravated each other without making it personal.

Jibes at your opponent is good sport if it can be done within the context of the argument and not made as ridicule.

[PSUSkinsFan21]

Originally Posted by Huddle

I challenge you to dig further in your research and target the agressors, those who take perfectly good threads and turn them into harsh personal exchanges.

Yah, like those people who call into question the ability of other members to ever make sound logical arguments simply because that member makes the suggestion that the other person may have actually been wrong........hey wait a minute.......

Sorry, I just couldn't resist. I have a tendency to