How Will Campbell Be Handled?

[Huddle]

Originally Posted by TAFKAS

Here's a stat for you. Huddle has started 12 threads since joining us. And 4 have been locked. With quite possibly a 5th on the way.

That has to be some sort of record.

Another deceptive stat.

I challenge you to dig further in your research and target the agressors, those who take perfectly good threads and turn them into harsh personal exchanges.

Right now, you're like the ref who flags the player who retaliates rather than the one who threw the first punch.

[SmootSmack]

Originally Posted by Huddle

Another deceptive stat.

I challenge you to dig further in your research and target the agressors, those who take perfectly good threads and turn them into harsh personal exchanges.

Right now, you're like the ref who flags the player who retaliates rather than the one who threw the first punch.

I was only joking with you, however...

I didn't follow the "rooting for Goliath" thread so no comment there

In my opinion, the "DVOA Statistics" thread was your attempt to continue a pointless debate that had already been locked in the "Brunell vs. Bledsoe" thread. The mods locked it for a reason. To start another thread on realtively the same issue wasn't the brightest move.

Plus in this post seemed like you were stating that there are a lot of "know-it-alls" here. I think you tend to confuse "know-it-all" with "don't agree with Huddle"

You didn't start the "Brunell vs. Bledsoe" thread but you can't deny you had an instrumental role in its demise.

Again, I was just messing with you. But I can't be the only one who sees that threads you're involved in tend to take odd turns.

[Huddle]

TAFKAS

You didn't start the "Brunell vs. Bledsoe" thread but you can't deny you had an instrumental role in its demise.

No denial; but to be candid, the emotional reaction I got surprised me when I simply remarked that IMO conventional football stats are almost useless. I was made to feel like I'd just informed a kindergarten class that there was no Santa.

Again, I was just messing with you. But I can't be the only one who sees that threads you're involved in tend to take odd turns.

Sure that's fine. I love controversy, but these debates would be a whole lot more fun if we just aggravated each other without making it personal.

Jibes at your opponent is good sport if it can be done within the context of the argument and not made as ridicule.

[PSUSkinsFan21]

Originally Posted by Huddle

I challenge you to dig further in your research and target the agressors, those who take perfectly good threads and turn them into harsh personal exchanges.

Yah, like those people who call into question the ability of other members to ever make sound logical arguments simply because that member makes the suggestion that the other person may have actually been wrong........hey wait a minute.......

Sorry, I just couldn't resist. I have a tendency to