Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


2004: The draft we should be grading

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-01-2006, 03:44 PM   #1
skins052bgr8
Special Teams
 
skins052bgr8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Richmond, Va.
Age: 50
Posts: 288
Re: 2004: The draft we should be grading

I tell you what, I just watched the 05 highlights again for the 5000 time and it should not even be a question about this front office and what they have done although they have missed on some. That highlight clip should say it all on how Gibbs and crew have built this team whether it was average draft or a very good FA signings they have done well. Those big clips of highlights is all ones that many have criticized.

-Trading up for Cooley
-Carlos Rogers instead of Mike Williams
-Portis is not a power Gibbs back
-Cornelius Griffin very good when healthy
-Moss is not as good as Coles
-Shawn Springs injury prone, been just as dominate as Champ not saying he is Champ, but he filled in well.
-Marcus Washington is a beast
-Sean Taylor Pro Bowl if keeps his off field issues under control after this ordeal passes
-Daniels came on strong the final weeks of the season hopefully it carries over.
-Jason Campbell???? Potential to be our franchise QB for a long time, we will see.
-Brunell had the best year of his career last year and our first playoff trip since 1999 though many still question his ability
Highlight Video is filled with people this group has brought in.
skins052bgr8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2006, 03:47 PM   #2
amorentz
Special Teams
 
amorentz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Washington, DC
Age: 46
Posts: 368
Re: 2004: The draft we should be grading

Quote:
Originally Posted by skins052bgr8
I tell you what, I just watched the 05 highlights again for the 5000 time and it should not even be a question about this front office and what they have done although they have missed on some. That highlight clip should say it all on how Gibbs and crew have built this team whether it was average draft or a very good FA signings they have done well. Those big clips of highlights is all ones that many have criticized.

-Trading up for Cooley
-Carlos Rogers instead of Mike Williams
-Portis is not a power Gibbs back
-Cornelius Griffin very good when healthy
-Moss is not as good as Coles
-Shawn Springs injury prone, been just as dominate as Champ not saying he is Champ, but he filled in well.
-Marcus Washington is a beast
-Sean Taylor Pro Bowl if keeps his off field issues under control after this ordeal passes
-Daniels came on strong the final weeks of the season hopefully it carries over.
-Jason Campbell???? Potential to be our franchise QB for a long time, we will see.
-Brunell had the best year of his career last year and our first playoff trip since 1999 though many still question his ability
Highlight Video is filled with people this group has brought in.
Amen, brother! Preach on!
amorentz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2006, 03:48 PM   #3
Beemnseven
Pro Bowl
 
Beemnseven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Virginia Beach
Age: 52
Posts: 5,311
Re: 2004: The draft we should be grading

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk72
Handing out grades the day after the draft has always seemed a little silly ...
We hear this a lot around draft time – that it's silly to grade teams on their drafts when nobody has any idea of how these players will perform in the NFL.

But if you're grading drafts based on the information that's available, certainly you can gauge how well each team did collecting players according to their prospective status coming out of college. If this weren't true, then there would be no player rankings; which is something every front office, coaching staff and scouting department in the NFL has.

Grading drafts is fine. You've just got to define what your basing the grade on.
Beemnseven is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2006, 03:55 PM   #4
MTK
Hail Raiser
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,050
Re: 2004: The draft we should be grading

Quote:
Originally Posted by Beemnseven
We hear this a lot around draft time – that it's silly to grade teams on their drafts when nobody has any idea of how these players will perform in the NFL.

But if you're grading drafts based on the information that's available, certainly you can gauge how well each team did collecting players according to their prospective status coming out of college. If this weren't true, then there would be no player rankings; which is something every front office, coaching staff and scouting department in the NFL has.

Grading drafts is fine. You've just got to define what your basing the grade on.
True, I just think it's funny when blowhards in the media get all hyped up like their word on the draft is final and absolute, even before any of these guys put on a NFL uniform.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:16 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.38961 seconds with 11 queries