Is Lavar's Career over?

[12thMan]

Originally Posted by TheMalcolmConnection

I think all of us have a little homer in them, but I try to keep the Haterade to a minimum. The NFC East WILL be the most competitive conference in the league without a doubt and one key injury here or there could put a team in the basement for good.

For a quick review:

Washington Redskins - Just to elaborate a little bit more on the team, the offensive line has two of the best tackles in the game, one of the best guards, an improved center and let's hope Dockery continues to improve. The defensive line is beast with Griffin in the middle. I have this feeling Montgomery will be in a heavy rotation by the middle of the year.

Philadelphia Eagles - They worry me the most. They had a great draft and got some really great players. They might not be great this year, but give that line some time to gel and they'll be good (but fortunately for the rest of the division McNabb has only a few years left in him). Brown will continue to improve and be a pretty decent player. Basically, the Eagles season will hinge on if Reid wants to be a dumbass or not. It's ALL coaching this year.

Dallas Cowboys - Time will only tell if the offensive line will return healthy from those serious injuries it had. Both running backs are average at best and TO is the only WR of any quality on the team. Witten will again be one of their most reliable receiving threats with TO being double teamed. Just like Strahan and McNabb, Bledsoe is another year older and another year slower. The Cowboys REALLY should have invested in a QB unless they think Henson has improved enough in NFL Europe. The defense will be above average next year, but nothing special. Their defense is the most overhyped part of their team.


I've already elaborated on the Giants, so we'll leave it at that.

Good re-cap, Malc. The only thing that worries me about the Cowboys is that T.O.'s presence immediately makes life easier for Glenn and co. And one on one Glenn 'aint half bad. And we've seen what Witten can do after the catch. He's very capable!

On defense they have a couple of guys who could be dangerous too.

All in all I think all of these teams are separated by one or two games.

[TheMalcolmConnection]

Honestly, I see the Eagles improving to 8-8 or 9-7. They'll need some time to gel and Westbrook and McNabb are their only stars left. The rest of the defense is aging. We can at least look forward to having a young(ish) team.

[TheMalcolmConnection]

Honestly, I don't see Witten run a lot after the catch. I don't know what it is about him, but he ALWAYS seems open and has loads of room to run, but he goes down like a ton of bricks. It's all good though. I give it 5-6 games before TO is a distraction. Even though this year he might play nice. We'll see.

[dirthogs311]

Anyone see Lavar's interview on Quite Frankly on ESPN. Its now on ESPN Motion check it out.

[warriorzpath]

yup, the most significant thing he said was: that he covered for gibbs. When Stephen A. Smith asked him how, he responded by saying he is still in the nfl. I guess implying that he would get himself in trouble or rock the boat by elaborating.

He needs to get off the microphone and do something with the giants before he starts talking again.

[dirthogs311]

Originally Posted by warriorzpath

yup, the most significant thing he said was: that he covered for gibbs. When Stephen A. Smith asked him how, he responded by saying he is still in the nfl. I guess implying that he would get himself in trouble or rock the boat by elaborating.

He needs to get off the microphone and do something with the giants before he starts talking again.

Exactly, but thats wut you get in NY a nice podium for you to say whatever you want. He really looks like crap though you think hes been hangin with Ricky Williams??

[warriorzpath]

Originally Posted by dirthogs311

He really looks like crap though you think hes been hangin with Ricky Williams??

I was thinking the same thing (he looks like crap) - he just doesn't seem like the same lavar before he got injured.

[warriorzpath]

Originally Posted by dirthogs311

Exactly, but thats wut you get in NY a nice podium for you to say whatever you want.

I know it's new york, but it's also Lavar wanting the attention, which at this point is undeserving. To me, when you start off somewhere you start off humble and then prove yourself - and THEN you can talk - but until then just work your butt off.

As a comparison, look at Ramsey handling himself so far in New York. I can always respect someone that HAS respect for others.

[monk81]

Originally Posted by warriorzpath

yup, the most significant thing he said was: that he covered for gibbs. When Stephen A. Smith asked him how, he responded by saying he is still in the nfl. I guess implying that he would get himself in trouble or rock the boat by elaborating.

He needs to get off the microphone and do something with the giants before he starts talking again.

Next thing you will hear is that he covered for Joe Pa too

Beware of the Redskin curse LaVar just ask Antonio Pierce and Fred Smoot how it all worked out last year.............

I hope we sweep dem Gints...............

[monk81]

As for the Boyz.........Parcells is already tired of the media asking about T.O. said he won't answer anymore questions about him until July.........
I think that T.O. won't cross Parcells path.....but he will get on Bledsoe's case when he doesn't get the ball enough...........

[TheMalcolmConnection]

Ohhhhhhhhhhhhh MY, don't be fucking coming on HERE and telling ME ANY type of shit. You want consistency, you would think that Cooley has more than proven it so far. I try REALLY hard to not get fired up about football, but someone calling me out like this fucking deserves it. First off, learn how to fucking spell CoolEy, next off, where the fuck did this come from? Cooley would have made Pro Bowls in both years had he not been listed as an "H-Back". If you are all about subtance, you would know this. He's listed as a FULLBACK. Good lookin' out chief. Next off, I would think that I made it adamantly clear my point anyway. Gonzo was the FIRST RECEIVING OPTION FOR THE CHIEFS, Cooley was not. Cooley had far more TDs last year than Gonzo. Cooley also ranked just a few yards lower than the other two "Pro Bowl" candidates of this year and had just as many if not more TDs than all other TEs except for Gates, ALSO a first receiving option for San Diego.

http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/statis...on=2&year=2005

So don't come in here and call me out on shit like that. Do not EVER fucking tell me to not open my mouth.

[TheMalcolmConnection]

LOL. What a way to start a Monday. Getting called out by a holier-than-thou Giants fan.

And Giantone, you USED to be cool.

[Giantone]

Originally Posted by TheMalcolmConnection

LOL. What a way to start a Monday. Getting called out by a holier-than-thou Giants fan.

And Giantone, you USED to be cool.

Who called who out Rocky? Look all I said in a post is that you (the Redskins ) did'nt have the same wepons as a matter of fact I said you had the better recievers ,at no point did I attack Cooly he is no Gonzo and untill he's in the pro bowl as a tight end not some made up position like "H back"then he won't be !

Aagin take your opinion and file it ,cause nobody cares .

[TheMalcolmConnection]

Originally Posted by Giantone

Who called who out Rocky? Look all I said in a post is that you (the Redskins ) did'nt have the same wepons as a matter of fact I said you had the better recievers ,at no point did I attack Cooly he is no Gonzo and untill he's in the pro bowl as a tight end not some made up position like "H back"then he won't be !

Aagin take your opinion and file it ,cause nobody cares.

Anybody else care what I think?

[#56fanatic]

Originally Posted by TheMalcolmConnection

Anybody else care what I think?

Not really, you both are a couple of tools.