|
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
05-17-2006, 03:51 PM
|
#1 |
|
MVP
Join Date: May 2005
Location: washington, D.C.
Posts: 11,460
|
Re: Brunell in Saunders's offense ?
This is great!
BTW, I'm only trying to raise my number of posts 
|
|
|
|
05-17-2006, 03:52 PM
|
#2 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,880
|
Re: Brunell in Saunders's offense ?
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
05-17-2006, 03:53 PM
|
#3 | |
|
MVP
Join Date: May 2005
Location: washington, D.C.
Posts: 11,460
|
Re: Brunell in Saunders's offense ?
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
05-17-2006, 04:55 PM
|
#4 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,880
|
Re: Brunell in Saunders's offense ?
When I reread the posts, it appears repetitious on my part - but all I'm doing is going back to the same points over and over again because that's the 2 main things i'm arguing. It's simple: I believe Saunders and I judge players after I watch them play (and not before).
If you think I shouldn't do the 2 things above then that's your opinion. |
|
|
|
|
05-17-2006, 06:57 PM
|
#5 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 43
Posts: 17,620
|
Re: Brunell in Saunders's offense ?
great, does it make a lot more sense after you've posted it the 15th time?
instead of discussing how grievously out of context you're taking that quote or pointing out a QB that showed up for the very first time after 35, you totally ignore those points and repeating the same thing which isn't even relevent as a reponse. how do you tell if a player is any good when video isn't immediately available? just assume they're all great? stats have their place, and if you can't see that a guy throwing 30tds is better than a guy throwing 12tds without video, well, that's a bit silly. |
|
|
|
|
05-17-2006, 07:02 PM
|
#6 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 38
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: Brunell in Saunders's offense ?
Well, his point is that you can't judge Collins yet even though he's 30 something which is valid, but you can certainly draw a stronger correlation between him and Shane Matthews then you can between him and Rich Gannon.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
|
|
|
|
05-17-2006, 07:13 PM
|
#7 | |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 43
Posts: 17,620
|
Re: Brunell in Saunders's offense ?
Quote:
If you really believe he's a star or has the chance to be great that strongly, we can always put money on it. |
|
|
|
|
|
05-18-2006, 10:14 PM
|
#8 |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Greensboro, North Carolina
Posts: 6,766
|
Re: Brunell in Saunders's offense ?
I'll admit I haven't read this whole thread...been gone for away, just wanted to know if there have been any Brunnell bashing on here?
__________________
"Fire Up That Diesel!" |
|
|
|
|
05-18-2006, 10:22 PM
|
#9 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 38
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: Brunell in Saunders's offense ?
Can't say there has been. This thread has really been about Todd Collins and Rich Gannon. Two QBs who definately don't belong in the same sentence.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
|
|
|
|
05-20-2006, 11:53 AM
|
#10 |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Age: 51
Posts: 142
|
Re: Brunell in Saunders's offense ?
I got tired of reading all of these posts. And if anybody cares anymore you can email me your thoughts. But here are mine: Brunell will start. Saunders does not make any final decisions despite his title. Gibbs does. Since Gibbs is back Synder does not tell anybody what to do. Gibs is running the show, like it or not, I don't care, I love it. So that's it, I repeat, Suanders is not selecting a starting QB and it will be Brunell untill......
Hail! |
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
