83 Skins Rank #4 All Time

[Giantone]

Originally Posted by TAFKAS

Doesn't make too much sense to me either. First I think you said why not the last 75 years? Then you said the last 10 years?

What's wrong with 25?

If you are going to do a best of ,then do it from the begining.Just don't pick when you want .Pick the top 10 of all time from 1927,Jim Brown will show up in there some where.

Again why 25 ?

[SmootSmack]

Originally Posted by Giantone

If you are going to do a best of ,then do it from the begining.Just don't pick when you want .Pick the top 10 of all time from 1927,Jim Brown will show up in there some where.

Again why 25 ?

I don't know. Maybe it's just not as big a deal to me. 25 years, 35 years, 50 years. Whatever. It's just an arbitrary list subject to opinion

[Giantone]

Originally Posted by TAFKAS

I don't know. Maybe it's just not as big a deal to me. 25 years, 35 years, 50 years. Whatever. It's just an arbitrary list subject to opinion

Bingo , my point .Unless it's all incluesive that's all it is ...opinion.

[SmootSmack]

Originally Posted by Giantone

Bingo , my point .Unless it's all incluesive that's all it is ...opinion.

even if it was all inclusive it would still be opinion. It's not a statistical list. Not like they're saying "Team A is number one because they score 600 points, Team B is number two because they scored 500 points, Team C 400" and so on

[Redskins8588]

Originally Posted by Giantone

If you are going to do a best of ,then do it from the begining.Just don't pick when you want .Pick the top 10 of all time from 1927,Jim Brown will show up in there some where.

Again why 25 ?

Maybe if it was a list of the top rushers then Jim Brown would show up, but really who else was on the browns offense other than Jim Brown? If you look at the article it was listed as the top offense not top offensive player...

[Giantone]

Originally Posted by Redskins8588

Maybe if it was a list of the top rushers then Jim Brown would show up, but really who else was on the browns offense other than Jim Brown? If you look at the article it was listed as the top offense not top offensive player...

well never know, will we?

[Redskins8588]

Originally Posted by Giantone

well never know, will we?

You make no sense at all, if you look at all the teams on the list, each team had atleast more than just one offensive weapon. The Browns just had Jim Brown. And that we do know, who else was on the Browns offense when Jim Brown carried the team, er the ball for the Browns? It is not like the future which we will never know how good Reggie Bush is or the great throwing arm of Vince Young those are unknown...