Art Monk vs Michael Irvin

[steveo395]

Originally Posted by That Guy

so 750 catches and 3 rings is a gimme, but 940 catches and 3 rings isn't... great math there.

i was thinking the same thing but then saw that it was already posted twice before me

Peter King is such a moron


just look at this queer....i wanna just punch him in his fat face


edit: I just wrote him an email that said
"In your article, you said, "Catching 750 balls for a three-time Super Bowl winner and being the key guy in the locker room on game days ... that should make him a gimme." How does that make Michael Irvin a gimme, but Art Monk, who caught 940 balls and won 3 superbowls, didn't even make the list. He had the most catches of all time when he retired. Stop being bias and just write and vote how you are supposed to. There is no way Michael Irvin should get in before Art Monk. Really Michael Irvin shouldn't get in at all or at least he should have to wait a while because he didn't do as well as Monk, and he played in a later time when receivers numbers were higher. You are a fat douchebag and I hate you."