The Ultimate NFL Depth Chart

[Hail2theskins]

Originally Posted by 724Skinsfan

Personally, as much as I hate to admit it, the Eagles have pretty good depth.

depth with???? coy detmer? thats a joke... or jeff garcia who threw twice as many interceptions as touchdowns in the 6 games he played last season i wouldnt exactly call that reliable

[724Skinsfan]

Originally Posted by Hail2theskins

depth with???? coy detmer? thats a joke... or jeff garcia who threw twice as many interceptions as touchdowns in the 6 games he played last season i wouldnt exactly call that reliable

I'd say a career 85.8 QB rating along with 19k passing yards and 126 TD passes makes for a fairly reliable backup QB in a familiar West Coast offense.

[GTripp0012]

Originally Posted by 724Skinsfan

I'd say a career 85.8 QB rating along with 19k passing yards and 126 TD passes makes for a fairly reliable backup QB in a familiar West Coast offense.

If Garcia can still play, which I don't know if he can, he's more than capable of McNabb numbers in the west coast.

[MTK]

Originally Posted by GTripp0012

If Garcia can still play, which I don't know if he can, he's more than capable of McNabb numbers in the west coast.

Garcia capable of McNabb numbers??

Which McNabb do you mean? The one that put up huge numbers in 2004 or the one that struggled with injuries in 2005?

Garcia is definitely past his prime. He's a very capable backup, one could certainly do much worse. But he's no longer capable of putting up big numbers over the course of an entire season.

[GTripp0012]

Originally Posted by Mattyk72

Garcia capable of McNabb numbers??

Which McNabb do you mean? The one that put up huge numbers in 2004 or the one that struggled with injuries in 2005?

Garcia is definitely past his prime. He's a very capable backup, one could certainly do much worse. But he's no longer capable of putting up big numbers over the course of an entire season.

That's just it. McNabb put up monsterous numbers in 2004, but outside of that one season he's nothing special. Good, just nothing special. His comp. % for example:

'00-58.0
'01-57.8
'02-58.4
'03-57.5
'04-64.0
'05-59.1

So hes a 58% career passer, and had an aberation year in 2004. 58% certainly isnt bad, but lets take a look at Garcia's #'s (under Mariucci in the west coast) over the same time period.

'00-63.3
'01-62.7
'02-62.1
'05-59.0

This is pretty interesting. It looks like in the years where both men had Owens, they complete a significantly high %. In any situation, the numbers are quite comprable. Of course, the Lions are a far more problematic team than the Eagles, so we really don't know if Garcia has lost a step (he's 36). Gannon was at the top of his game at age 37. George Blanda was past 40 and winning games. I should point out that Owens wasn't the only factor that contributed to McNabb's high '04 numbers, as QB's across the league put up career highs that year.

So in conclusion, a long post to prove my point, but I believe that Garcia is still capable of McNabb numbers or better if he has to play. McNabb's intangibles mean so much to that team that there is no controversy at all. It's just that historically, Garcia is the better passer.