Parcells may call plays

[BrudLee]

I find it amusing that our team is searching for new ways to win games (hiring a new playcaller on offense), and theirs is going to try to do it the old way (going back to 80's era playcalling).

[724Skinsfan]

Good! Hopefully his desire to rein in TO will result in him trying especially hard to distribute the passing game to as many players as he can. This results in TO complaining and everyone getting mad. Thanks for the division, Bill! Not that we really needed your help but thanks anyway.

[hooskins]

Haha Scheend I love your advice...

[hooskins]

The first thing that I thought to post after reading the title "Parcells may call plays", is "Parcells may also be gay", but it seems that issue has already been addressed.

Obviously we do know Parcells is a decent coach, the stats show that, but come on he is the Cowboys coach, our arch rivals. Are you guys(referring to those who seem "upset") seriously not going to have fun talking a little bit of smack to Parcells?

Geez, it is also offseason, what the hell else are we suppose to do? Hey I got an idea, lets talk about if Brunell should start, or better yet, lets talk bout how LaVar is a dick for leaving, and why Ramsey should have stayed. F that shit, its offseason, so I personally authorize the shit talking to continue.....

[TheMalcolmConnection]

Originally Posted by BrudLee

I find it amusing that our team is searching for new ways to win games (hiring a new playcaller on offense), and theirs is going to try to do it the old way (going back to 80's era playcalling).

What I find MOST amusing is that it (at least seems) that teams in the NFC East are preparing JUST for the Redskins.

[724Skinsfan]

Originally Posted by TheMalcolmConnection

What I find MOST amusing is that it (at least seems) that teams in the NFC East are preparing JUST for the Redskins.

You make a good point, TMC. The Giants grabbed a lot of secondary depth obviously to counter our speedy wideout options. On the flip side, were the 'Skins offseason moves made as a counter to any of the other specific teams perceived weaknesses? I don't think so, in fact it looks to me that the other NFC teams have us in their sights not last year's "division champs".

[hooskins]

Originally Posted by 724Skinsfan

You make a good point, TMC. The Giants grabbed a lot of secondary depth obviously to counter our speedy wideout options. On the flip side, were the 'Skins offseason moves made as a counter to any of the other specific teams perceived weaknesses? I don't think so, in fact it looks to me that the other NFC teams have us in their sights not last year's "division champs".

But a Giants fan could easily say their secondary sucked and was bunned on numerous occasions, not just agaisnt Moss and Company. I understand where you guys are coming from, but it could also be viewed in another way.

[724Skinsfan]

I know what you mean but it still looks to me that we appear to be looking (slightly) behind us at the other NFC East teams.

On a side note, did anybody read the comments at the bottom of the Jon Jansen article? Check out who wrote in his opinion on the second comment.

[FRPLG]

Originally Posted by TheMalcolmConnection

What I find MOST amusing is that it (at least seems) that teams in the NFC East are preparing JUST for the Redskins.

On paper we shouldn't lose this division. We ahev the most rounded team with playmakers everywhere.

But on paper means little. The team who stays healthiest wins this division I think. The coaching on every team is good and the talent on every team is above average at the least. We are gonna beat each other up and see who stays on top. Hopefully it will be us.