Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


The Taylor Jacobs watch

Locker Room Main Forum


View Poll Results: What chance does Taylor Jacobs have of being on the team come 9/11?
100% - he's a lock 2 1.33%
75% - decent chance 17 11.33%
50% - so-so 52 34.67%
25% - unlikely 58 38.67%
0% - he's a goner for sure 21 14.00%
Voters: 150. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-17-2006, 01:52 PM   #1
Beemnseven
Pro Bowl
 
Beemnseven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Virginia Beach
Age: 52
Posts: 5,311
Re: The Taylor Jacobs watch

I voted what I think will happen, as opposed to what I HOPE will happen.

50/50. But I hope it's zero.

Stranger things have happened though. What we see and what the coaches see can be different things. Remember keeping Donovan Greer over Lloyd Harrison back in the Schottenheimer days? All Greer did was get toasted throughout preseason, while Harrison returned interceptions for touchdowns. Guess who got the axe?

Gibbs weighed Jacobs' performance to Darnerian McCants' and somehow, Jacobs survived. You just never know.
Beemnseven is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2006, 02:34 PM   #2
freddyg12
Playmaker
 
freddyg12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,540
Re: The Taylor Jacobs watch

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheMalcolmConnection
I don't think we'd get anything of value for Patten though. I have a feeling Patten will be a huge factor for us this year, Henry Ellard style.
I said something similar in another thread, that I think he could make some big catches on 3rd down.But he doesn't play spec. teams, so it could make sense to cut him.
freddyg12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2006, 02:04 PM   #3
MTK
Hail Raiser
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,050
Re: The Taylor Jacobs watch

Jacobs will be on the team if: we keep 6 WRs which I highly doubt, OR if someone gets injured.

Otherwise I just don't see him staying over Thrash who is a coaching staff favorite and a quality teams guy, or Patten who is a proven vet.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2006, 03:11 PM   #4
dmek25
MVP
 
dmek25's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: lancaster,pa
Age: 64
Posts: 10,672
Re: The Taylor Jacobs watch

i dont like thrash or jacobs, but if one has to stay, it will be thrash. decent on special teams and a church going veteran
__________________
"It's better to be quiet and thought a fool than to open ones mouth and remove all doubt."
courtesy of 53fan
dmek25 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2006, 03:27 PM   #5
Monkeydad
Living Legend
 
Monkeydad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: PA
Age: 47
Posts: 17,460
Re: The Taylor Jacobs watch

As a WR...goner for sure.

As a Special Teams player....I'll give him "unlikely" to "so-so".
Monkeydad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2006, 04:05 PM   #6
12thMan
MVP
 
12thMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: washington, D.C.
Posts: 11,460
Re: The Taylor Jacobs watch

I'm pretty much in the minority here. I gave TJ a 75% chance of making the squad.

I think that you have to factor in people getting nicked up during camp or preseason. Which doesn't exclude Jacobs given his history of consistently getting banged up.

Secondly, I don't think you can discount Gibbs' loyalty.
While I don't think that Gibbs favors individuals, per se, I do think he favors character and other intangibles. And according to many inside Redskins Park, Jacobs has at least those things in his favor. I guess we'll see, but if this guy shows up a little bit he'll be on this squad.
12thMan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2006, 04:09 PM   #7
SmootSmack
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
Re: The Taylor Jacobs watch

Quote:
Originally Posted by 12thMan
I'm pretty much in the minority here. I gave TJ a 75% chance of making the squad.

I think that you have to factor in people getting nicked up during camp or preseason. Which doesn't exclude Jacobs given his history of consistently getting banged up.

Secondly, I don't think you can discount Gibbs' loyalty.
While I don't think that Gibbs favors individuals, per se, I do think he favors character and other intangibles. And according to many inside Redskins Park, Jacobs has at least those things in his favor. I guess we'll see, but if this guy shows up a little bit he'll be on this squad.
Here's the thing though. Maybe TJ does have character but that doesn't separate him from the other guys he's competing with for that 4th or 5th WR spot. He's not going up against a bunch of talented a-holes.
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2006, 04:14 PM   #8
12thMan
MVP
 
12thMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: washington, D.C.
Posts: 11,460
Re: The Taylor Jacobs watch

Quote:
Originally Posted by TAFKAS
Here's the thing though. Maybe TJ does have character but that doesn't separate him from the other guys he's competing with for that 4th or 5th WR spot. He's not going up against a bunch of talented a-holes.
That's why I said if this guy steps up a little bit. I really think it's his spot to lose....again. (by a little bit, I really didn't mean it litterally
12thMan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2006, 04:49 PM   #9
joecrisp
The Starter
 
joecrisp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Charlottesville, VA
Age: 50
Posts: 1,501
Re: The Taylor Jacobs watch

As most everyone here knows, I was a BIG believer in Jacobs's potential. But his consistent underachievement as a WR when the live bullets start flying, combined with his penchant for injury, have made him a huge disappointment in my eyes.

However, that doesn't mean he's a sure bet to be cut. He does have some things working in his favor. As others have mentioned, the guy possesses all the intangible qualities that Gibbs looks for in a player, he's got some special teams value, and he's always been one of the most consistent, hard-working players in practice (when he's not injured, that is).

That's why I'd put his chances of making the final roster at 50-50.

Some other reasons Jacobs could make it:
  • Patten, like McCants before him, is not a special teams contributor, and therefore if he does not supplant Lloyd or Randle-El among the top 3 wideouts, he would most certainly be on the bubble, as the 4th, 5th and 6th (if they keep that many) receivers are expected to be solid special teamers. Essentially, if you're not a top 3 wideout on this roster, you'd better be a top 11 special teamer.
  • Jacobs is significantly younger than Patten or Thrash, and therefore still has a trace of upside
  • Jacobs has a lower salary cap value than both Thrash and Patten
  • While the cap hit for releasing Patten would be pretty significant, the hit for releasing Thrash would be slightly less than the hit the team would incur for cutting Jacobs, so releasing Thrash would make more financial sense

But I also have a very hard time seeing Gibbs part with Thrash, so realistically I would put Jacobs's chances at a little less than 50-50-- maybe more in the realm of 40% that he stays. Though if he misses anything more than a day or two of training camp due to injury, I'd say he's a goner for sure. He's got to be the iron man of training camp to make the roster, and he's got to show he's a better value than Thrash.
__________________
Joe Crisp covered Redskins camps for TheWarpath.net for three years. He also covered Redskins Training Camp 2005 for The Daily Progress.
joecrisp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2006, 04:22 PM   #10
724Skinsfan
Playmaker
 
724Skinsfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Roanoke, VA
Posts: 3,508
Re: The Taylor Jacobs watch

I voted 75% only because I think we'll keep 6 receivers.
__________________
"I hope I'm getting better. I hope you haven't seen my best." - Jim Zorn
724Skinsfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2006, 04:32 PM   #11
Schneed10
A Dude
 
Schneed10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Newtown Square, PA
Age: 46
Posts: 12,458
Re: The Taylor Jacobs watch

Quote:
Originally Posted by 724Skinsfan
I voted 75% only because I think we'll keep 6 receivers.
At the expense of what position? Linebacker? DB? FB/TE?

I don't think so. If you keep 6 WRs you'll be forced to drop a spot at LB, DB, or FB/TE that you were carrying last year. I'm not sure where Gibbs would be willing to sacrifice.
__________________
God made certain people to play football. He was one of them.
Schneed10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2006, 04:36 PM   #12
Beemnseven
Pro Bowl
 
Beemnseven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Virginia Beach
Age: 52
Posts: 5,311
Re: The Taylor Jacobs watch

Quote:
Originally Posted by 724Skinsfan
I voted 75% only because I think we'll keep 6 receivers.
On a Joe Gibbs coached team? There's not a chance in hell they keep 6 wideouts. To have that many, means that you keep one less offensive lineman, tight end, you name it, off the roster every game. For a team that's expected to use 2 or 3 wideouts at most through most of any game, plus have enough room on the active roster to use Cooley, Fauria, a backup running back and full back -- not to mention a defensive coach that depends on multiple defensive backs -- there's just not enough room for 6 WRs.
Beemnseven is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2006, 05:18 PM   #13
724Skinsfan
Playmaker
 
724Skinsfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Roanoke, VA
Posts: 3,508
Re: The Taylor Jacobs watch

Quote:
Originally Posted by Beemnseven
On a Joe Gibbs coached team? There's not a chance in hell they keep 6 wideouts. To have that many, means that you keep one less offensive lineman, tight end, you name it, off the roster every game. For a team that's expected to use 2 or 3 wideouts at most through most of any game, plus have enough room on the active roster to use Cooley, Fauria, a backup running back and full back -- not to mention a defensive coach that depends on multiple defensive backs -- there's just not enough room for 6 WRs.
You and Schneed are both right. Not really sure what I was thinking when I typed that response. Mathematically it felt like I had worked it out, but probably because I don't want to cut either Thrash for his ST skills or Jacobs because I cringe to think he'll do for another team what we've expected him to do here.
__________________
"I hope I'm getting better. I hope you haven't seen my best." - Jim Zorn
724Skinsfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2006, 04:48 PM   #14
offiss
Registered User
 
offiss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: sparta, new jersey [ northern jersey ]
Age: 62
Posts: 3,097
Re: The Taylor Jacobs watch

I gave him a 75% as well, I just don't feel that anyone outside the skins knows for sure what he's capable of, he is now going to get a crack in not only a real NFL offense but what will become a great NFL offense, the verdict will be out after this season.

TJ is a pretty good specials guy himself but we know Thrash is one of the best on coverage teams, as well as being one of Gibbs's favorite guy's, but I do believe TJ's reciveing skills are far an above Thrash's, I like TJ's chances but it's not a slam dunk, he has a lot to prove right now, but what can't be ingnored are the comments by his peers, such as Bailey, who stated that TJ is maybe the toughest player he had to cover, and Portis who has said TJ is the best player in the NFL to never see the field. Those are very strong and bold comments, there has to be something with this guy to make players say that, I just don't think his talent has been utilized yet.
offiss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2006, 04:18 PM   #15
skinsfanthru&thru
Playmaker
 
skinsfanthru&thru's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Richmond, VA
Age: 45
Posts: 3,815
Re: The Taylor Jacobs watch

he should be gone already but they will probably keep him around til the last second in case of an injury during camp and he also didn't do to bad on special teams.
__________________
"Ahhh, so you're stupid in 3 languages?"
skinsfanthru&thru is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:42 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.98407 seconds with 12 queries