Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Is Duckett's presence going to piss off CP??

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-24-2006, 04:22 PM   #1
onebum
Camp Scrub
 
onebum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: The cheap seats, though I always have plans to move to a luxury booth.
Age: 46
Posts: 57
Re: Is Duckett's presence going to piss off CP??

Quote:
Originally Posted by GTripp0012 View Post
Haha. I like the way you think. This isnt anywhere near a legal formation though.
I thought since that would leave 2 TE/WRs/whatevers to lineup on the line outside the tackles I would be a legal formation? Not saying I like it(too many bodies in too little space, big bodies) Just wondering why it wouldn't be legal. Sorry if its a dumb question pertaining to formations, I'd rather find out the facts now rather than wonder and not know.

I would put several other guys out there before Rock to lead block/carry starting with Cooley, White Jr., Nemo, even Faria and Johnson for blocking, not sure about carrying.
__________________
Da Bum
onebum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2006, 12:35 AM   #2
STPainmaker
Impact Rookie
 
STPainmaker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 524
Re: Is Duckett's presence going to piss off CP??

Quote:
Originally Posted by onebum View Post
I thought since that would leave 2 TE/WRs/whatevers to lineup on the line outside the tackles I would be a legal formation? Not saying I like it(too many bodies in too little space, big bodies) Just wondering why it wouldn't be legal. Sorry if its a dumb question pertaining to formations, I'd rather find out the facts now rather than wonder and not know.

I would put several other guys out there before Rock to lead block/carry starting with Cooley, White Jr., Nemo, even Faria and Johnson for blocking, not sure about carrying.
As far as the formation goes as long as there is seven men on the line and the closest man to the sideline being an eligible receiver of some sort its cool. So a full house backfield is legal. I guess.
__________________
REDSKINS FOR LIFE BEEETCH!!!!
STPainmaker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2006, 01:30 AM   #3
onebum
Camp Scrub
 
onebum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: The cheap seats, though I always have plans to move to a luxury booth.
Age: 46
Posts: 57
Re: Is Duckett's presence going to piss off CP??

Quote:
Originally Posted by STPainmaker View Post
As far as the formation goes as long as there is seven men on the line and the closest man to the sideline being an eligible receiver of some sort its cool. So a full house backfield is legal. I guess.

Thats what I thought, didn't know if the rules had changed though. Someone in atlanta not too many years ago used to run these types of formations, Glanville maybe? Someone smart help me figure out who please. He'd have the 5 moveable guys all in the middle, sometimes wishbone with 2 TEs, sometimes an I with an offset rb and 2 TEs, sometimes wishbone with one TE on the line, one WR out wide....and I don't know why i'm babbleing about it so i'll stop now.
__________________
Da Bum
onebum is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:13 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.20607 seconds with 11 queries