SI.Coms 2004 Redskins Preview

AnonEmouse · 08-01-2004, 11:01 AM

Whilst it is only someones opinion, 3 things made me react.

1) No mention of Jacobs. OK his inkury made him a non-event last year, but hte kid has ability. I'm surprised he hasn't been mentioned. I suspect Gibbs will get the most out of him - possibly moving up to 2nd/3rd WR?
2) The depth chart has Koslowski and Rasby as starters and the article has no mention of TE (an important position for Gibbs). No word on Cooley's potential then? The reports I've read say he'll make a good blocker AND receiver. Anyone else think he might force his way into the reckoning?
3) Why does Taylor starting at FS automatically mean Bowen moved to SS and Ohalete is out on his ear? I suspect there will be some serious competition between the 2 of them to partner Taylor.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Threaded Mode

08-01-2004, 11:01 AM	#15
AnonEmouse Playmaker Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: UK Age: 60 Posts: 2,895	Whilst it is only someones opinion, 3 things made me react. 1) No mention of Jacobs. OK his inkury made him a non-event last year, but hte kid has ability. I'm surprised he hasn't been mentioned. I suspect Gibbs will get the most out of him - possibly moving up to 2nd/3rd WR? 2) The depth chart has Koslowski and Rasby as starters and the article has no mention of TE (an important position for Gibbs). No word on Cooley's potential then? The reports I've read say he'll make a good blocker AND receiver. Anyone else think he might force his way into the reckoning? 3) Why does Taylor starting at FS automatically mean Bowen moved to SS and Ohalete is out on his ear? I suspect there will be some serious competition between the 2 of them to partner Taylor.

SI.Coms 2004 Redskins Preview

Locker Room Main Forum