![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
| View Poll Results: Is it time to bench Brunell? | |||
| Yes |
|
141 | 61.84% |
| Give him another week |
|
37 | 16.23% |
| Give him a few more weeks |
|
35 | 15.35% |
| No |
|
15 | 6.58% |
| Voters: 228. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: nyc
Age: 50
Posts: 2,631
|
Re: Brunell Solely Responsible for Loss?
Ladell sucked as a runner, and as a blocker. wiped out our ground dimension then we had to pass, couldn't stop a blitzer.
T.J. sucked too, but i'll give him slack time because he's new. and at least when HE runs straight smack into somebody like Ladell does, he may actually get some positive yardage.
__________________
a fan. not a cheerleader. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 380
|
Re: Brunell Solely Responsible for Loss?
Quote:
TJ's pass protection was not at all good (this was not the case in ATL, so it is probably just a system thing), but his running was solid. He really should have been in on the 3rd and one where Betts got stoned. One of the demotions should be Betts. TJ should be the backup.
__________________
"Lighten up, Sandy Baby." |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: PA
Age: 47
Posts: 17,460
|
Re: Brunell Solely Responsible for Loss?
Quote:
Betts has a LOT more practice under this "complicated" system I keep hearing about. Ladell certainly didn't help himself stay ahead of Duckett last night, but we now have to wonder if he'll get his kick returning job back from Rock. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|