Brunell sucks - Ends Game with 2/5 passing

[REDSKIN1]

Why Are't We Getting Jc Any Reps? In The Fourth Quarter Of Ths Game Brunell Mostly Just Handed The Ball Off. Wouldn't This Have Been A Good Time To Put Jc In. Sooner Or Later We Need To Start Developing A Long Term Franchise Quaterback To Be Successful In This League. (ie. Eagles/pats/colts.......) We Can't Just Keep Bringing In Vets With 2-3 Years Left.

[MTK]

Originally Posted by REDSKIN1

Why Are't We Getting Jc Any Reps? In The Fourth Quarter Of Ths Game Brunell Mostly Just Handed The Ball Off. Wouldn't This Have Been A Good Time To Put Jc In. Sooner Or Later We Need To Start Developing A Long Term Franchise Quaterback To Be Successful In This League. (ie. Eagles/pats/colts.......) We Can't Just Keep Bringing In Vets With 2-3 Years Left.

Yeah handing the ball off would have really benefited him.

[REDSKIN1]

Originally Posted by Mattyk72

Yeah handing the ball off would have really benefited him.

HANDING THE BALL OFF WOULD HAVE DONE MORE FOR HIM THAN MARK BRUNELL. MARK'S BEEN HANDING THE BALL OFF FOR 14 YEARS IN THIS LEAGUE. AND HOW MANY GAMES HAVE JC BEEN IN? OH OH I KNOW !!!! 0
REMEMBER THIS IS HIS 6TH YEAR WITH A DIFFERENT OFF COORD....

[MTK]

Originally Posted by REDSKIN1

HANDING THE BALL OFF WOULD HAVE DONE MORE FOR HIM THAN MARK BRUNELL. MARK'S BEEN HANDING THE BALL OFF FOR 14 YEARS IN THIS LEAGUE. AND HOW MANY GAMES HAVE JC BEEN IN? OH OH I KNOW !!!! 0
REMEMBER THIS IS HIS 6TH YEAR WITH A DIFFERENT OFF COORD....

Please elaborate, how would have coming in the game and handing off benefited Jason Campbell??

Does he really need work on his RB exchanges?

[70Chip]

Originally Posted by Mattyk72

Please elaborate, how would have coming in the game and handing off benefited Jason Campbell??

Does he really need work on his RB exchanges?

It would have prevented our starter from getting walloped on that fumble return. No benefit to Campbell, I agree with MK72 there, but I would think they would be a little more wary of injuries.

[REDSKIN1]

Originally Posted by Mattyk72

Please elaborate, how would have coming in the game and handing off benefited Jason Campbell??

Does he really need work on his RB exchanges?

FOR ONE HE WOULD HAVE GOTTEN GAME SPEED EXPERIENCE, HE COULD GET REPS WITH MOST OF THE FIRST TEAM OFF. NOT TO MENTION THE EVER SO VALUABLE QUATERBACK CENTER EXCHANGE. I MEAN YOU DID SEE WHAT HAPPENED TO DAVID CARR AND HIS CENTER..LOL I THINK ITS VERY IMPORTANT TO START GETTING JC READY. IT MIGHT NOT BE FOR THIS YEAR BUT IN MOP UP SITUATIONS THE FUTURE OF THIS TEAM SHOULD BE ON THE FIELD.. WHO KNOWS WHAT IF MB GETS HURT AND JC HAS TO PLAY THIS YEAR. (WHICH IS VERY POSSIBLE). WOULD YOU WANT A QB IN THERE WHO HAS 0 REPS OR A QB IN THERE WHO AT LEAST HAS BEEN GETTING SOME REPS IN THE GAME, EVEN IF ITS ONLY HANDING THE BALL OFF...

[onlydarksets]

Originally Posted by REDSKIN1

HANDING THE BALL OFF WOULD HAVE DONE MORE FOR HIM THAN MARK BRUNELL. MARK'S BEEN HANDING THE BALL OFF FOR 14 YEARS IN THIS LEAGUE. AND HOW MANY GAMES HAVE JC BEEN IN? OH OH I KNOW !!!! 0
REMEMBER THIS IS HIS 6TH YEAR WITH A DIFFERENT OFF COORD....

Turn off the caps lock - it undermines anything you might say.

[skinsguy]

Originally Posted by REDSKIN1

HANDING THE BALL OFF WOULD HAVE DONE MORE FOR HIM THAN MARK BRUNELL. MARK'S BEEN HANDING THE BALL OFF FOR 14 YEARS IN THIS LEAGUE. AND HOW MANY GAMES HAVE JC BEEN IN? OH OH I KNOW !!!! 0
REMEMBER THIS IS HIS 6TH YEAR WITH A DIFFERENT OFF COORD....

Sorry, you don't put JC in in this situation. Look, you've just seen this team get rattled against our division foes and lose the first game with a heartbreak field goal. You let your starters who have struggled, i.e. MB, stay in and savor this win. If we're up 42-0, I can see putting the back up in...which would be Todd Collins since Campbell is #3.

[GoSkins!]

Brunnel should be benched for going 0 for 1 on his last pass.