![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Germantown, MD
Posts: 2,782
|
Re: Reason for (Cautious) Optimism
[quote=onlydarksets;220673]You're seriously surprised that calling someone a "so called fan" because they took a realistic view of our chances of winning "pushed a button"?
You just gotta know Southpaw. He is always pessimistic, and more often that not he picks the Skins to lose... and he knows I rib him for it regularly! |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: So. MD
Age: 48
Posts: 1,319
|
Re: Reason for (Cautious) Optimism
I play a few football pools, and I'm actually 2-1 in picking Skins games. The only time I was wrong was when I picked them to beat the Vikings...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Germantown, MD
Posts: 2,782
|
Re: Reason for (Cautious) Optimism
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: nyc
Age: 50
Posts: 2,631
|
Re: Reason for (Cautious) Optimism
ouch is that true?
__________________
a fan. not a cheerleader. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: So. MD
Age: 48
Posts: 1,319
|
Re: Reason for (Cautious) Optimism
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Germantown, MD
Posts: 2,782
|
Re: Reason for (Cautious) Optimism
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Virginia Beach
Age: 52
Posts: 5,311
|
Re: Reason for (Cautious) Optimism
For the record, I predicted a sqeaker of a win against the Vikings, a loss to the Cowboys, and another squeaker of a win in Houston.
My best week so far in picking the games straight up was Week 2 ... I was 11-4. I sucked with my picks in Weeks 1 and 3. Yeah, I'm pessimistic this week. I look at what the Jags did to Pittsburgh's "Fast" Willie Parker and that vaunted Steeler O-line -- held them to 26 yards rushing. Then, take a look at what they did to Peyton Manning and the Colts in Indy: 48 yards rushing, and limited Manning's production to a very un-Peyton like 14 for 31 and 219 yards passing. Now tell me, what in anyone's right mind could convince me that our offense -- which struggled against the Vikings, was stopped cold in Dallas, with all the penalties they've racked up -- can run the ball, and pass it effectively against Stroud, Henderson and the other guys that make up one of the top defenses in the league? I've seen nothing to make me believe otherwise. The only thing I can hope for is for the Jags to have an "off" day. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: nyc
Age: 50
Posts: 2,631
|
Re: Reason for (Cautious) Optimism
Quote:
while you're right Jax looks super tough, i would honestly just be happy to see this team play to their potential even if its during a squeaker loss.
__________________
a fan. not a cheerleader. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: Reason for (Cautious) Optimism
Quote:
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 26
|
Re: Reason for (Cautious) Optimism
Quote:
Huh? WTF? Your post pancakes me. You have never thought about coaching I would bet. If you were the OC would you be thinking about what the D is going to call or do? Thank the Almighty that we have Saunders and not you, the O calls, runs, and executes the play. The D reacts. "have an off day" I hope our offense does not have to worry about them having an "off day" and if that happens, holy shinoly the D does not either. Damn it is like magic Hail 44 |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|